2021-10-22 01:11:43 -0500, Rob Landley via austin-group-l at The Open Group:
[...]
> > > Where system("-blah") fails because sh is insane legacy weirdness and it
> > > turns
> > > out that -c does NOT take an argument. So:
> > >
> > > sh -c -i "echo hello"
> > >
> > > Works, which that means
On 10/21/21 6:38 PM, enh wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:56 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> > I was on the posix call today, and they have a bug:
> >
> > https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1440
> >
> > Where system("-blah") fails because sh is insane legacy weirdness and it
> > turns
> >
Robert Elz wrote, on 22 Oct 2021:
>
> | > I also wonder about the requirement that 'b' be ignored for fdopen().
> | It matches the requirement that 'b' is ignored for fopen() and freopen().
>
> I think that's a bug in fopen() and will open a bug about that one (sometime
> soonish), and
22 Ekim 2021 Cuma tarihinde Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The
Open Group yazdı:
> 2021-10-22 01:11:43 -0500, Rob Landley via austin-group-l at The Open
> Group:
> [...]
> > > > Where system("-blah") fails because sh is insane legacy weirdness
> and it turns
> > > > out that -c does NOT
Rob Landley wrote, on 22 Oct 2021:
>
> On 10/21/21 6:38 PM, enh wrote:
> > > it's unclear whether anyone's actually hit this in practice? and even if
> > > they
> > had, their portable workaround would be to prefix with "exec "?
> >
> > maybe try libc-co...@lists.openwall.com and see if there's
2021-10-22 12:43:11 +0300, Oğuz:
[...]
> > So system() was broken when sh started accepting more than one
> > option argument.
> >
>
> I wouldn't say broken. This is rather an academic case, I don't see why
> anyone would name a utility that way (`-potato'/`+potato'), I don't know a
> single
All
Enclosed are the minutes of the thursday meeting this week
regards
Andrew
--
Minutes of the 21st October 2021 Teleconference Austin-1172 Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 23rd October 2021
Attendees:
Don Cragun, IEEE PASC OR
Nick Stoughton,
