Austin Group teleconference +1 888 974 9888 PIN 618 156 403

2022-05-12 Thread Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//opengroup.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.22.1//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20120311T02
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20121104T02
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:627dec5a87...@opengroup.org
DTSTAMP:20220513T052754Z
ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR:MAILTO:a.jo...@opengroup.org
CREATED:20220513T00Z
DESCRIPTION:Web/Project: Single UNIX Specification\nTitle: Austin Group tel
 econference +1 888 974 9888 PIN 618 156 403\nDate/Time: 19-May-2022 at 11:
 00 America/New_York\nDuration: 1.50 hours\nURL: https://collaboration.open
 group.org/platform/single_unix_specification/events.php\n\n* All calls are
  anchored on US time *\n\nTopic: Austin Group teleconference\n
 ---\nAudio conference information
 \n---\n\nYou are invit
 ed to a Zoom meeting.\n\nMeeting ID: 618 156 403\n\nJoin from PC\, Mac\, i
 OS or Android: https://logitech.zoom.us/j/618156403\n \nor join by phone:
 \nUS: 888 974 9888\nUK: 800 031 5717\nDE: 800 724 3138\nFR: 805 082 588\n
 \nOther international numbers available here:\nhttps://zoom.us/u/adlvrb8IL
 j\n \nMeeting ID: 618 156 403\n\nor join from a H.323/SIP Device:\n   
  Dial: 162.255.37.11 (US West) or 162.255.36.11 (US East)\nMeeting ID:
  618 156 403\n\nShare from a PC or MAC: https://zoom.us/share/618156403\n
 \nOr iPhone one-tap (US Toll):  +16699006833\,618156403# or +16465588656\,
 618156403#\n\nPassword for zoom call  ends with x\n\nAll Austin Group part
 icipants are most welcome to join the call.\nThe call will last for 90 min
 utes.\n\n\nAn etherpad is usually up for a meeting\, with a URL using the 
 date format as below:\n\nhttps://posix.rhansen.org/p/202x-mm-dd\n\nLOGIN R
 EQUIRED to write to the ETHERPAD (Use your gitlab.opengroup.org login.)\n
 \n \n\nBug reports are available at:\nhttps://www.austingroupbugs.net\n
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220519T11
DURATION:PT1H30M0S
LAST-MODIFIED:20220513T012754Z
ORGANIZER;CN=Single UNIX Specification:MAILTO:do-not-re...@opengroup.org
SEQUENCE:0
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SUMMARY:Austin Group teleconference +1 888 974 9888 PIN 618 156 403
TRANSP:OPAQUE
URL:https://collaboration.opengroup.org/platform/single_unix_specification/
 events.php
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-VISIBILITY:40
X-JOINBEFORE:5
X-CATEGORY:Teleconference
X-PLATO-SITE:Single UNIX Specification
X-PLATO-SITEID:136
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR


meeting.ics
Description: application/ics


Re: POSIX bind_textdomain_codeset(): some invalid codeset arguments

2022-05-12 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Harald van Dijk wrote in
 :
 |On 12/05/2022 18:19, Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open 
 |Group wrote:
 |> Bruno Haible wrote in
 |>   <4298913.vrqWZg68TM@omega>:
 |>|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |>|>  ...
 |>|>| [.] "UTF-7"."
 |>|>
 |>|> That is overshoot.
 |>|
 |>|No. UTF-7 is invalid here because it produces output that is not NUL
 |>|terminated. See:
 |>|
 |>|$ printf 'ab\0' | iconv -t UTF-7 | od -t c
 |>|000   a   b   +   A   A   A   -
 |>|007
 |>|
 |>|strlen() on such a return value makes invalid memory accesses.
 |>|You can convince yourself by running
 |>|$ OUTPUT_CHARSET=UTF-7 valgrind ls --help
 |> 
 |> This is then surely bogus?  UTF-7 is a normal single byte
 |> character set and is to be terminated like anything else.  Nothing
 |> in RFC 2152 nor RFC 3501 if you want makes me think something
 |> else.
 |
 |RFC 2152's rules 1 and 3 only allow specifying the listed characters as 
 |their ASCII form. All other characters, including U+, must be 
 |encoded using rule 2. GNU iconv is doing what the RFC specifies here.

No really, please.  And please do not strip important content,
i am neither Chinese nor Russian, and especially not one of the
other 7 billion that do not count.
(I said surely bogus because i alone see the shiny light of having
found give-me-five GNU iconv errors.  Or even beyond that.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)



Re: POSIX bind_textdomain_codeset(): some invalid codeset arguments

2022-05-12 Thread Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
On 12/05/2022 18:19, Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open 
Group wrote:

Bruno Haible wrote in
  <4298913.vrqWZg68TM@omega>:
  |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
  |>  ...
  |>| [.] "UTF-7"."
  |>
  |> That is overshoot.
  |
  |No. UTF-7 is invalid here because it produces output that is not NUL
  |terminated. See:
  |
  |$ printf 'ab\0' | iconv -t UTF-7 | od -t c
  |000   a   b   +   A   A   A   -
  |007
  |
  |strlen() on such a return value makes invalid memory accesses.
  |You can convince yourself by running
  |$ OUTPUT_CHARSET=UTF-7 valgrind ls --help

This is then surely bogus?  UTF-7 is a normal single byte
character set and is to be terminated like anything else.  Nothing
in RFC 2152 nor RFC 3501 if you want makes me think something
else.


RFC 2152's rules 1 and 3 only allow specifying the listed characters as 
their ASCII form. All other characters, including U+, must be 
encoded using rule 2. GNU iconv is doing what the RFC specifies here.


Cheers,
Harald van Dijk



Re: ML reconfigured?

2022-05-12 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 <20220512173651.yl-pn%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
 |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 | <20220512173033.jp_28%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
 ||Just wondering, i no longer receive my own messages to the ML?
 ||I would henceforth save away my sent copy if this is desired?
 |
 |So that i got.  It thus seems selective values are selectively
 |applied just as currently desired.

(Looking at this, it was likely because i was in Cc:, and i was
there because another ML was addressed.  Sorry for the noise.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)



Re: ML reconfigured?

2022-05-12 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 <20220512173033.jp_28%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
 |Just wondering, i no longer receive my own messages to the ML?
 |I would henceforth save away my sent copy if this is desired?

So that i got.  It thus seems selective values are selectively
applied just as currently desired.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)



ML reconfigured?

2022-05-12 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Hello.

Just wondering, i no longer receive my own messages to the ML?
I would henceforth save away my sent copy if this is desired?

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)



Re: POSIX bind_textdomain_codeset(): some invalid codeset arguments

2022-05-12 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Bruno Haible wrote in
 <4298913.vrqWZg68TM@omega>:
 |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |>  ...
 |>| [.] "UTF-7"."
 |> 
 |> That is overshoot.
 |
 |No. UTF-7 is invalid here because it produces output that is not NUL
 |terminated. See:
 |
 |$ printf 'ab\0' | iconv -t UTF-7 | od -t c
 |000   a   b   +   A   A   A   -
 |007
 |
 |strlen() on such a return value makes invalid memory accesses.
 |You can convince yourself by running
 |$ OUTPUT_CHARSET=UTF-7 valgrind ls --help

This is then surely bogus?  UTF-7 is a normal single byte
character set and is to be terminated like anything else.  Nothing
in RFC 2152 nor RFC 3501 if you want makes me think something
else.  (RFC 5092 "IMAP URL Scheme", which invents the sane-enough-
to-think-yourself "UTF-7 -> UTF-16 -> UCS-4 -> UTF-8 -> HEX"
conversion scheme, and reverse, even implies the opposite, the
example functions both NUL terminate the string.)
Except Mark Davis said something like "UTF-7 was a failure"
once on the Unicode ML, if i recall correctly, and i surely added
"sadly", given the Punycode mess with domain names.
But one more ship that sailed.  But a pity it is.
Why should NUL be treated differently??  No.  No, i think it is
a bug in GNU iconv that noone stumbled upon because noone is using
UTF-7.  Heck, how about that, for example:

  LC_ALL=C printf 'ab\0' |  iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-16 | od -t c
  000  \0  \0   a  \0   b  \0  \0  \0

Two leading NULs?

  LC_ALL=C printf 'ab\0' |  iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t ucs-2 | od -t c
  000   a  \0   b  \0  \0  \0

That yes.

  LC_ALL=C printf 'ab\0' |  iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 | od -t c
  000   a   b  \0

Yes.

  LC_ALL=C printf 'ab\0' |  iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-7 | od -t c
  000   a   b   +   A   A   A   -

No.  Somehow they all bogus, take SunOS 5.10:

  LC_ALL=C printf 'ab\0' |  iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-16 | od -t
  000 376 377  \0   a  \0   b  \0  \0

Ooh, now it gets scary!!  Interestingly OpenBSD 7.1 behaves the
same, likely it is an old instance of GNU iconv thus, there it
says "GNU libiconv 1.16", here it says "iconv (GNU libc) 2.35".

So unless someone convinces me you are arguing based on buggy
software.  UTF-7 is just another 7-bit single byte character set,
and thus.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter   he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)



[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000901]: reserve _POSIX* shell option namespace for future use

2022-05-12 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group


The following issue has been CLOSED. 
== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=901 
== 
Reported By:rhansen
Assigned To:
== 
Project:1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1
Issue ID:   901
Category:   Shell and Utilities
Type:   Enhancement Request
Severity:   Editorial
Priority:   normal
Status: Closed
Name:   Richard Hansen 
Organization:   BBN 
User Reference:  
Section:2.14 'set' special built-in 
Page Number:2382 
Line Number:75879-75902 
Interp Status:  --- 
Final Accepted Text: 
Resolution: Rejected
Fixed in Version:   
== 
Date Submitted: 2014-12-04 18:56 UTC
Last Modified:  2022-05-12 16:28 UTC
== 
Summary:reserve _POSIX* shell option namespace for future
use
==
Relationships   ID  Summary
--
related to  854 requirement for additional built-in uti...
related to  0001071 Name space reservation should move to XBD
related to  935 warn users away from naming functions a...
== 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2014-12-04 18:56 rhansenNew Issue
2014-12-04 18:56 rhansenName  => Richard Hansen  
2014-12-04 18:56 rhansenOrganization  => BBN 
2014-12-04 18:56 rhansenSection   => 2.14 'set' special
built-in
2014-12-04 18:56 rhansenPage Number   => 2382
2014-12-04 18:56 rhansenLine Number   => 75879-75902 
2014-12-04 18:56 rhansenInterp Status => --- 
2014-12-04 18:58 rhansenDesired Action Updated   
2014-12-11 16:21 nick   Relationship added   related to 854  
2014-12-23 11:45 joerg  Note Added: 0002511  
2015-04-09 15:17 rhansenRelationship added   related to 935  
2015-04-09 15:19 rhansenNote Added: 0002612  
2015-04-09 15:20 rhansenNote Added: 0002613  
2018-01-04 17:13 rhansenNote Deleted: 0002613
2018-01-04 17:23 nick   Relationship added   related to 0001071  
2018-01-05 10:21 geoffclare Note Added: 0003909  
2018-05-09 11:51 kreNote Added: 0004024  
2018-05-09 11:58 kreNote Added: 0004025  
2022-05-12 16:28 geoffclare Status   New => Closed   
2022-05-12 16:28 geoffclare Resolution   Open => Rejected
==




[Online Pubs 0000887]: printf and other functions appear many times in search results

2022-05-12 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group


The following issue has been UPDATED. 
== 
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=887 
== 
Reported By:safinaskar
Assigned To:
== 
Project:Online Pubs
Issue ID:   887
Category:   Main Index
Type:   Error
Severity:   Editorial
Priority:   normal
Status: New
Name:   Askar Safin 
Organization:
User Reference:  
URL:http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799 
Section:- 
== 
Date Submitted: 2014-11-01 11:08 UTC
Last Modified:  2022-05-12 16:03 UTC
== 
Summary:printf and other functions appear many times in
search results
== 

-- 
 (0005834) agadmin (administrator) - 2022-05-12 16:03
 https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=887#c5834 
-- 
The index is controlled by a master file with patterns of the form

word.idx:@f /functions/vswprintf.html 
word.idx:@t vswprintf - wide-character formatted output of a stdarg
argument list  
word.idx:=vswprintf - wide-character formatted output of a stdarg argument
list 

We could remove the duplicates from the file, although whether this is a
big enough issue to warrant a change right now is debateable.

We will review this for a future generation of the html or maintenance work
when time permits. 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2014-11-01 11:08 safinaskar New Issue
2014-11-01 11:08 safinaskar Name  => Askar Safin 
2014-11-01 11:08 safinaskar URL   =>
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799
2014-11-01 11:08 safinaskar Section   => -   
2015-02-24 09:03 agadminNote Added: 0002559  
2022-05-12 16:03 agadminNote Added: 0005834  
==




[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0001077]: Recommend support for wide-character regcomp and regexec and/or specify multi-byte behavior

2022-05-12 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group


The following issue has been CLOSED. 
== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1077 
== 
Reported By:deadpixi
Assigned To:
== 
Project:1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1
Issue ID:   1077
Category:   System Interfaces
Type:   Enhancement Request
Severity:   Editorial
Priority:   normal
Status: Closed
Name:   Rob King 
Organization:
User Reference:  
Section:regcomp 
Page Number:1783-1789 
Line Number:57399-57703 
Interp Status:  --- 
Final Accepted Text: 
Resolution: Rejected
Fixed in Version:   
== 
Date Submitted: 2016-09-11 17:47 UTC
Last Modified:  2022-05-12 15:52 UTC
== 
Summary:Recommend support for wide-character regcomp and
regexec and/or specify multi-byte behavior
== 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   New Issue
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   Name  => Rob King
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   Section   => regcomp 
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   Page Number   => -   
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   Line Number   => -   
2016-09-11 17:53 deadpixi   Note Added: 0003376  
2016-09-11 17:53 deadpixi   Issue Monitored: deadpixi
2016-09-11 21:03 Don Cragun Note Added: 0003377  
2016-09-11 21:08 Don Cragun Page Number  - => 1783-1789  
2016-09-11 21:08 Don Cragun Line Number  - => 57399-57703
2016-09-11 21:08 Don Cragun Interp Status => --- 
2016-09-11 23:54 deadpixi   Note Added: 0003378  
2022-05-12 15:51 nick   Note Added: 0005833  
2022-05-12 15:51 nick   Note Edited: 0005833 
2022-05-12 15:52 nick   Status   New => Closed   
2022-05-12 15:52 nick   Resolution   Open => Rejected
==




[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0001077]: Recommend support for wide-character regcomp and regexec and/or specify multi-byte behavior

2022-05-12 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1077 
== 
Reported By:deadpixi
Assigned To:
== 
Project:1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1
Issue ID:   1077
Category:   System Interfaces
Type:   Enhancement Request
Severity:   Editorial
Priority:   normal
Status: New
Name:   Rob King 
Organization:
User Reference:  
Section:regcomp 
Page Number:1783-1789 
Line Number:57399-57703 
Interp Status:  --- 
Final Accepted Text: 
== 
Date Submitted: 2016-09-11 17:47 UTC
Last Modified:  2022-05-12 15:51 UTC
== 
Summary:Recommend support for wide-character regcomp and
regexec and/or specify multi-byte behavior
== 

-- 
 (0005833) nick (manager) - 2022-05-12 15:51
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1077#c5833 
-- 
T%his issue  failed to get a sponsor, and is therefore rejected. If
complete wording can be specified and forwarded to a sponsor (IEEE, ISO/IEC
JTC 1/SC 22, or The Open Group), it can be reconsidered in the future. 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   New Issue
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   Name  => Rob King
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   Section   => regcomp 
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   Page Number   => -   
2016-09-11 17:47 deadpixi   Line Number   => -   
2016-09-11 17:53 deadpixi   Note Added: 0003376  
2016-09-11 17:53 deadpixi   Issue Monitored: deadpixi
2016-09-11 21:03 Don Cragun Note Added: 0003377  
2016-09-11 21:08 Don Cragun Page Number  - => 1783-1789  
2016-09-11 21:08 Don Cragun Line Number  - => 57399-57703
2016-09-11 21:08 Don Cragun Interp Status => --- 
2016-09-11 23:54 deadpixi   Note Added: 0003378  
2022-05-12 15:51 nick   Note Added: 0005833  
==




[Issue 8 drafts 0001583]: tidy up definition of the term "Special Built-In"

2022-05-12 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group


The following issue has been RESOLVED. 
== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1583 
== 
Reported By:calestyo
Assigned To:
== 
Project:Issue 8 drafts
Issue ID:   1583
Category:   Base Definitions and Headers
Type:   Enhancement Request
Severity:   Editorial
Priority:   normal
Status: Resolved
Name:   Christoph Anton Mitterer 
Organization:
User Reference:  
Section:3.335 Special Built-In 
Page Number:76 
Line Number:2335 
Final Accepted Text: 
Resolution: Accepted
Fixed in Version:   
== 
Date Submitted: 2022-05-09 01:13 UTC
Last Modified:  2022-05-12 15:06 UTC
== 
Summary:tidy up definition of the term "Special Built-In"
== 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2022-05-09 01:13 calestyo   New Issue
2022-05-09 01:13 calestyo   Name  => Christoph Anton
Mitterer
2022-05-09 01:13 calestyo   Section   => 3.335 Special
Built-In
2022-05-09 01:13 calestyo   Page Number   => 76  
2022-05-09 01:13 calestyo   Line Number   => 2335
2022-05-12 15:06 Don Cragun Status   New => Resolved 
2022-05-12 15:06 Don Cragun Resolution   Open => Accepted
==




Re: When can shells remove "known" process IDs from the list?

2022-05-12 Thread Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Robert Elz wrote, on 12 May 2022:
>
>   | > I think they should remain independent.
>   | Sure, I agree.
> 
> I don't.  I cannot think of a single reason why the shell should be
> forced to maintain two separate lists of its child processes.  The jobs
> table needs to have them, so processes in the job can be identified as
> they finish.  Duplicating that in another table, for no particular reason
> I can imagine makes no sense to me.   Still, if others want to implement
> it that way, I don't object - but the standard has never required that,
> and should not, absent some very good reason, be changed to require it now.

The standard needs to specify them separately because, as per the
mail I just sent in reply to Chet, job numbers identify process groups
and therefore cannot identify asynchronous commands started with job
control disabled.

However, it is an internal implementation detail how that is managed.
If you want to have one table with some flag to say whether each
entry is a job or a "known process ID that's not a job", that's fine.

-- 
Geoff Clare 
The Open Group, Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 1AX, England



Re: When can shells remove "known" process IDs from the list?

2022-05-12 Thread Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Chet Ramey wrote, on 11 May 2022:
>
> On 5/10/22 12:03 PM, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
> 
> >> I'd be interested in your reasoning. The standard simply says that jobs
> >> and kill (and wait should be added) work with job %X notation whether
> >> or not job control is enabled.
> > 
> > The normative text relating to creation of job numbers/IDs is all
> > conditional on job control being enabled.
> 
> Where is that? It's not in the definition of Job ID, it's not in 2.9.3
> Asynchronous Lists, it's not in the `jobs' description, it's not part of
> the definition of Background Job or Foreground Job, it's not in any
> of fg/bg/kill/wait. I feel like I'm missing something obvious here.

You're looking in (some of) the right places, but missing the
significance of what's written there.  For example, on the jobs page
it says in STDOUT that the job number written to standard output
is "A number that can be used to identify the process group to the
wait, fg, bg, and kill utilities."

Since it identifies a process *group*, it's not possible for a job
number to identify an asynchronous command that was started with
job control disabled (as it won't be run in its own process group).

This is confirmed by the OPERANDS sections for kill and wait, which
describe the second form for the pid operand as "A job control job ID
(see XBD Section 3.204, on page 66) that identifies a background
process group to be {signaled/waited for}."

Also, you mention "the definition of Job ID", but there is no such
definition. The term that is defined is "Job Control Job ID", which
implies that a "Job ID" is always something connected with job control.

> >> OK. I'm pretty sure everyone already does this for the jobs list. Not sure
> >> whether you want it to include the known IDs list.
> > 
> > I think kre intended it apply to the known IDs list as well, and I
> > was agreeing with that.
> 
> So for the known IDs list, it's pretty much `wait' and `jobs', right?

The phrase kre used was "when their termination status has been
reported to the user - however that happens".  That includes information
written by an interactive shell before it writes a prompt.  Although
the standard says this information is about the exit status of
"the background job", it is also, by association, information about
the exit status of a process in the known process IDs list.

-- 
Geoff Clare 
The Open Group, Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 1AX, England



[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001584]: strfmon_l should be conditional on [CX]

2022-05-12 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group


The following issue has been CLOSED. 
== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1584 
== 
Reported By:bhaible
Assigned To:
== 
Project:1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2
Issue ID:   1584
Category:   System Interfaces
Type:   Error
Severity:   Editorial
Priority:   normal
Status: Closed
Name:   Bruno Haible 
Organization:   GNU 
User Reference:  
Section:strfmon_l 
Page Number:2039 
Line Number:65333-65334 
Interp Status:  --- 
Final Accepted Text: 
Resolution: Withdrawn
Fixed in Version:   
== 
Date Submitted: 2022-05-11 23:57 UTC
Last Modified:  2022-05-12 11:09 UTC
== 
Summary:strfmon_l should be conditional on [CX]
== 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleNew Issue
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleName  => Bruno Haible
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleOrganization  => GNU 
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleSection   => strfmon_l   
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaiblePage Number   => 2039
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleLine Number   => 65333-65334 
2022-05-12 09:25 geoffclare Note Added: 0005831  
2022-05-12 10:18 bhaibleNote Added: 0005832  
2022-05-12 11:09 geoffclare Interp Status => --- 
2022-05-12 11:09 geoffclare Status   New => Closed   
2022-05-12 11:09 geoffclare Resolution   Open => Withdrawn   
==




[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001584]: strfmon_l should be conditional on [CX]

2022-05-12 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1584 
== 
Reported By:bhaible
Assigned To:
== 
Project:1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2
Issue ID:   1584
Category:   System Interfaces
Type:   Error
Severity:   Editorial
Priority:   normal
Status: New
Name:   Bruno Haible 
Organization:   GNU 
User Reference:  
Section:strfmon_l 
Page Number:2039 
Line Number:65333-65334 
Interp Status:  --- 
Final Accepted Text: 
== 
Date Submitted: 2022-05-11 23:57 UTC
Last Modified:  2022-05-12 10:18 UTC
== 
Summary:strfmon_l should be conditional on [CX]
== 

-- 
 (0005832) bhaible (reporter) - 2022-05-12 10:18
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1584#c5832 
-- 
Indeed, the entire  and strfmon pages are implicitly wholly
[CX] shaded.

I withdraw the bug. 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleNew Issue
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleName  => Bruno Haible
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleOrganization  => GNU 
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleSection   => strfmon_l   
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaiblePage Number   => 2039
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleLine Number   => 65333-65334 
2022-05-12 09:25 geoffclare Note Added: 0005831  
2022-05-12 10:18 bhaibleNote Added: 0005832  
==




[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001584]: strfmon_l should be conditional on [CX]

2022-05-12 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
== 
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1584 
== 
Reported By:bhaible
Assigned To:
== 
Project:1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2
Issue ID:   1584
Category:   System Interfaces
Type:   Error
Severity:   Editorial
Priority:   normal
Status: New
Name:   Bruno Haible 
Organization:   GNU 
User Reference:  
Section:strfmon_l 
Page Number:2039 
Line Number:65333-65334 
Interp Status:  --- 
Final Accepted Text: 
== 
Date Submitted: 2022-05-11 23:57 UTC
Last Modified:  2022-05-12 09:25 UTC
== 
Summary:strfmon_l should be conditional on [CX]
== 

-- 
 (0005831) geoffclare (manager) - 2022-05-12 09:25
 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1584#c5831 
-- 
The entire strfmon() page specifies things that are not in the C standard,
and therefore nothing on that page needs CX shading any more than anything
on, say, the getpid() page does.

The fact that locale_t is shaded CX on the  page is irrelevant.
The locale_t definition for strfmon_l() is provided by  (where
it is not CX shaded).

The bug should be processed either as withdrawn (with Bruno's permission)
or as rejected. 

Issue History 
Date ModifiedUsername   FieldChange   
== 
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleNew Issue
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleName  => Bruno Haible
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleOrganization  => GNU 
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleSection   => strfmon_l   
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaiblePage Number   => 2039
2022-05-11 23:57 bhaibleLine Number   => 65333-65334 
2022-05-12 09:25 geoffclare Note Added: 0005831  
==