Andrew and I will both attend electronically.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Michell <
stephen.mich...@maurya.on.ca> wrote:
> Hello Andrew and Keld,
>
> The PSDO agreement covers documents produced exclusively by one IEEE and
> brought to ISO for ballot. That clearly does not apply to
Hello Andrew and Keld,
The PSDO agreement covers documents produced exclusively by one IEEE and
brought to ISO for ballot. That clearly does not apply to Austin Group
products, since the Austin group is a child of ISO/IEC/JTC 1/SC 22, IEEE and
the Open Group.
I spoke with Lisa Rachael (JTC 1
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1075
==
Reported By:Don Cragun
Assigned To:
Hi Andrew
Yes, IEEE is probably allowed to do that. But we do not want them to.
So we should ask them not to use this procedure.
"Acccording to their own procedures" is well defined within ISO and IEC,
via the Directives. There cannot be doubt on this.
How would you as ISO project editor fill ou
hi Keld, all
Thanks for your mail. As the Austin Group chair, and also the ISO project
editor, I can only reiterate what I was told by the ISO/IEC JTC1 secretariat -
see below.
>From Sally Seitz:
"Once IEEE has approved the document, I will submit it to ISO CS for
publication. The PSDO agre
Dear Andrew
Could you please stop the IEEE process? ISO needs to make their own processes,
as per our Austin group
procedures. IEEE should not interfere in the ISO processes. I expect you as
chair of the Austin group
to see to that procedures are adhered to. It should be the ISO project editor
