Re: [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000981]: Remove oudated set -o nolog

2019-10-27 Thread Harald van Dijk
On 27/10/2019 19:39, Shware Systems wrote: I thought the purpose of set -h was to ignore any previous hashing, and do an actual path search per 2.9.1.1 for each command until set +h says to use hashed paths again. This would be useful for apps that use a temporary path, but reset it to

Re: [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000981]: Remove oudated set -o nolog

2019-10-27 Thread Harald van Dijk
On 27/10/2019 17:16, Robert Elz wrote: Date:Sun, 27 Oct 2019 15:44:52 + From:Harald van Dijk Message-ID: <01735f8e-c0ef-a1d6-f8d1-258a669d9...@gigawatt.nl> | This could potentially be useful if the script author knows the command | will be executed in

Re: [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000981]: Remove oudated set -o nolog

2019-10-27 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sun, 27 Oct 2019 15:44:52 + From:Harald van Dijk Message-ID: <01735f8e-c0ef-a1d6-f8d1-258a669d9...@gigawatt.nl> | This could potentially be useful if the script author knows the command | will be executed in multiple subshells, but never in the parent

Re: [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000981]: Remove oudated set -o nolog

2019-10-27 Thread Harald van Dijk
On 27/10/2019 14:51, Robert Elz wrote: While the subject of this message refers to 7-TC1, the page/line numbers below refer to 7-TC2. If it hasn't already happened in some other issue/bug report that I'm unaware of, could we do the same thing as was done for "nolog" to the absurd -h option?

Re: [1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000981]: Remove oudated set -o nolog

2019-10-27 Thread Robert Elz
While the subject of this message refers to 7-TC1, the page/line numbers below refer to 7-TC2. If it hasn't already happened in some other issue/bug report that I'm unaware of, could we do the same thing as was done for "nolog" to the absurd -h option? I have no idea if it is implemented