Re: wait and stopped jobs

2022-03-01 Thread Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
On 28/02/2022 23:20, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: It is worth pointing out though that testing this in interactive shells is somewhat of a weird case - it should probably be done in a script instead. That's because of the effect of the (implicit) jobs command before

[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0000729]: Integrate posix_devctl() from standalone IEEE Std 1003.26 into the next revision of IEEE Std 1003.1

2022-03-01 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=729 == Reported By:Don Cragun Assigned To:

Re: wait and stopped jobs

2022-03-01 Thread Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 20:47:47 -0800 From:Don Cragun Message-ID: | The requirement for the shell to keep the exit status for a known | terminated process until wait is called is in [...] Thanks, but I knew all of that, and we do all of that. There's also (from

[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001544]: uudecode: standardise or at least reserve - as another special symbol for decoding to stdout

2022-03-01 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1544 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To: