10:07，DannyNiu via austin-group-l at The Open Group
> 写道：
>
> I see. May I suggest a different editorial fix:
>
> Change line 3215-3216
>
>> The following functions shall synchronize memory with respect to other
>> threads on all successful calls
>
> To
&g
I see. May I suggest a different editorial fix:
Change line 3215-3216
> The following functions shall synchronize memory with respect to other
> threads on all successful calls
To
> The functions in the following list, as well as the ones discussed further
> down in the prose, shall
Hi, all.
I’ve done a proof-reading of the general information chapter of rationale for
system interfaces - both POSIX.1-2017 and the part with diff marks in
202x_d3.pdf. I’ve submitted a few bug reports regarding my findings.
Hope you find it useful.
Cheers.
The title of this mail is that of a question I posted to the
Unix.StackExchange.com. The link is here:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/731488/186590
Specifically, I intended to confirm whether some of my understandings
Are correct or not:
In the current standard, the sem_post is listed as an
I’m glad and surprised that this didn’t take so long that it didn’t get decided
until issue 9.
Might I ask how did we resolve this? Just for the sake of record.
Or the next minute will contain these info?
> 2022-07-22 00:43:43，Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open
> Group
