This is my take on the discussion so far:
As the method of forcing an environment to be POSIX conforming is
implementation-defined in XBD 2, this method should be part of the conformance
questionnaire, for both booting into this environment before the interactive
shell starts, for freestand
2017-04-24 11:42:12 +0200, Joerg Schilling:
[...]
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> > That is incorrect. The "update XXX" naming has always been internal to
> > Solaris.
> > Solaris 10 and prior releases used the date for the marketing name
> > ("Solaris 7
> > 8/99", "Solaris 10 8/07", and so on).
Sorry for the binary content in the first attempt to reply
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> That is incorrect. The "update XXX" naming has always been internal to
> Solaris.
> Solaris 10 and prior releases used the date for the marketing name ("Solaris 7
> 8/99", "Solaris 10 8/07", and so on). S
bin_6wp18NC7X.bin
Description: Binary data
On 04/21/17 08:47 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stephane Chazelas wrote:
OK, "Solaris 11 and its maintenance releases" make more sense
than "Solaris 11 FCS and later". Thanks for clarifying.
This is how I thought Solaris always was maintained:
There are updates to a specific version th
hi Stephane, Joerg, all
Further comments below
> On 21 Apr 2017, at 16:13, Stephane Chazelas
> wrote:
>
{snip}
>> You will have to contact Oracle if you need more information.
>> The certification requires the supplier to supply a compliant system
>> configuration if a buyer wishes to pro
Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> OK, "Solaris 11 and its maintenance releases" make more sense
> than "Solaris 11 FCS and later". Thanks for clarifying.
This is how I thought Solaris always was maintained:
There are updates to a specific version that grant not to
break interfaces.
In
2017-04-21 15:22:53 +0100, Andrew Josey:
[...]
> This means that Oracle commits to keep Solaris 11 and its
> maintenance releases in compliance, and that if a buyer orders
> a compliant system it will be delivered in the correct
> configuration.
OK, "Solaris 11 and its maintenance releases" make m
hi Stephane
Comments below
> On 21 Apr 2017, at 13:22, Stephane Chazelas
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> today I found out that Solaris 11 didn't have the POSIX
> utilities installed by default unless you did a full desktop or
> server install (or installed the xcu4/xcu6 relevevant packages
> by hand
Hello,
today I found out that Solaris 11 didn't have the POSIX
utilities installed by default unless you did a full desktop or
server install (or installed the xcu4/xcu6 relevevant packages
by hand)
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/360359/posix-awk-on-solaris-11
Solaris 11 being SUSv3 cer
10 matches
Mail list logo
