bin_6wp18NC7X.bin
Description: Binary data
Sorry for the binary content in the first attempt to reply
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> That is incorrect. The "update XXX" naming has always been internal to
> Solaris.
> Solaris 10 and prior releases used the date for the marketing name ("Solaris 7
> 8/99", "Solaris 10 8/07", and so on). S
2017-04-24 11:42:12 +0200, Joerg Schilling:
[...]
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> > That is incorrect. The "update XXX" naming has always been internal to
> > Solaris.
> > Solaris 10 and prior releases used the date for the marketing name
> > ("Solaris 7
> > 8/99", "Solaris 10 8/07", and so on).
This is my take on the discussion so far:
As the method of forcing an environment to be POSIX conforming is
implementation-defined in XBD 2, this method should be part of the conformance
questionnaire, for both booting into this environment before the interactive
shell starts, for freestand
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1137
==
Reported By:sebor
Assigned To:ajosey
