All
Enclosed are the minutes from yesterdays call. Please note that the monday call
next week is cancelled.
regards
Andrew
-
Minutes of the 13th February 2020 Teleconference Austin-1005 Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 14th February 2020
Attendees:
Mark Ziegas
The following issue has a resolution that has been APPLIED.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=367
==
Reported By:eblake
Assigned To:
The following issue has a resolution that has been APPLIED.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=368
==
Reported By:Don Cragun
Assigned
The following issue has a resolution that has been APPLIED.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=370
==
Reported By:eblake
Assigned To:
The following issue has a resolution that has been APPLIED.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=373
==
Reported By:eblake
Assigned To:
It is certainly a good thing that this has been reopened, as what
was proposed to be inserted is, frankly, nonsense.
It is not that I have anything against a time reserved word, though
being a reserved word rather than a builtin, or special builtin does
make it impossible to redirect (as has been
As asked, is there an CMPXGCHG-like function in the standard?
I tried looking for keywords such as cmp, comp, ch, but
nothing turned up in the system interfaces list.
The C language introduced atomic functions in C11 though.
Presently, no. There are operations, such as with semaphores, where this sort
of functionality might be used but has been left unspecified as many CPUs don't
support exchanges; for most older ones only loads and stores are atomic, and
the volatile modifier and sigatomic_t types are geared to be