Re: [1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001108]: LONG_MIN must be <= -2147483648

2018-07-18 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I completely disagree on this change. Undefined behavior is useful Likewise. That part of the changes is clearly a bad idea and should not be applied to issue 8. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: [1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001108]: LONG_MIN must be <= -2147483648

2018-07-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2018-07-11 21:10:16 +, Austin Group Bug Tracker wrote: > (0004050) cmsmith (reporter) - 2018-07-11 21:10 > http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1108#c4050 > -- > These changes seem to invalidate compilers for use in

Re: [1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001108]: LONG_MIN must be <= -2147483648

2018-07-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2018-06-07 16:10:03 +, Austin Group Bug Tracker wrote: > On P567 L19829 (abs), replaceIf the result cannot be > represented, the behavior is undefined.withIf > the result cannot be represented, the result shall be > {INT_MIN}. > On P567 L19838 (abs), replaceIn two's-complement >