cvs version of autoconf usable??

2000-03-21 Thread John Fortin
Hi, I have a question about the stability of the current cvs version of autoconf. Currently I am using autoconf-2.13 under cygwin. I am trying to bulld libGGI. Unfortunately, autoheader fails because of the problem described by Eanie Boyd described in a previous posting.

Re: cvs version of autoconf usable??

2000-03-21 Thread Akim Demaille
| Hi, | I have a question about the stability of the current cvs version of | autoconf. Currently I am using autoconf-2.13 under cygwin. | I am trying to bulld libGGI. Unfortunately, autoheader fails because of | the problem described by Eanie Boyd described in a previous posting. | |

Re: cvs version of autoconf usable??

2000-03-21 Thread John Fortin
Akim Demaille wrote: | Hi, | I have a question about the stability of the current cvs version of | autoconf. Currently I am using autoconf-2.13 under cygwin. | I am trying to bulld libGGI. Unfortunately, autoheader fails because of | the problem described by Eanie Boyd described in a

Re: cvs version of autoconf usable??

2000-03-21 Thread Akim Demaille
"John" == John Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Yes, I can. Unfortunately, I am at work and my log files are at John home. I'll post them tonight. Thanks! John autoconf built fine ( except for the man files ). I ran the What problem did you meet with man pages? It's a failure if you

Re: Moving/Deleting open files isn't portable

2000-03-21 Thread Earnie Boyd
--- "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Haven't thought of one yet. But whatever the fix entails it will have to close the fd to foo before the mv/rm. In that case, Win-32 is not Posix compliant, and it should not be a significant

Re: Moving/Deleting open files isn't portable

2000-03-21 Thread Earnie Boyd
--- "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Haven't thought of one yet. But whatever the fix entails it will have to close the fd to foo before the mv/rm. In that case, Win-32 is not Posix compliant, and it should not be a significant

Re: Moving/Deleting open files isn't portable

2000-03-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry, sent too soon. Also, GNU's Not Unix, and the intent of autoconf is software portability. Indeed, and I don't mind people putting patches in to deal. But my tests don't worry about it, and I don't want GNU maintainers to think they have an

Re: cvs version of autoconf usable??

2000-03-21 Thread John Fortin
Akim Demaille wrote: "John" == John Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Yes, I can. Unfortunately, I am at work and my log files are at John home. I'll post them tonight. Thanks! John autoconf built fine ( except for the man files ). I ran the What problem did you meet with