On Mon, 29 May 2000, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
> The Autoconf macro archive (http://research.cys.de/autoconf-archive/) has
> a number of Java macros already. I haven't used them myself and can't
> vouch for their quality, nor do I know how they compare to yours, but it
> seems like it would be a g
Mo Dejong wrote:
> How much interest would there be in adding Java to the
> autoconf supported languages? I would be willing to
> convert some of the existing Java detect and compile macros
> over to the autoconf framework if folks were cool with
> the idea of adding Java support. I already have s
How much interest would there be in adding Java to the
autoconf supported languages? I would be willing to
convert some of the existing Java detect and compile macros
over to the autoconf framework if folks were cool with
the idea of adding Java support. I already have some nice
macros that can fi
Akim proposed a patch for the TODO in autoconf-patches (in "TOTO
autoconf" [sic]), including:
+** Pentateuch
+Heck, there is nothing after `Deuteronomy'! We're stuck, but we
+_must_ update the `history' section. Can't go to `New testament', we
+might hurt feelings? In addition, it means that th
Seeing as how Akim wants DJGPP to pass the testsuite, I figure it would be a
good idea report my initial results using DJGPP and Autoconf from CVS.
After setting some environment variables (CC, etc.) and correcting a DJGPP
specific bug in Bash 2.04, the test went well with one minor and one maj
On May 29, 2000, Marek Kowal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an .x file and want to create, using rpcgen, stub files in
> automake. Later on I want to compile and link part of them into server,
> and the other part into client. Did anybody excercised this already?
Add .x to SUFFIXES, the wri
Hi there,
I am afraid I have to trash your mailboxes a little. I have been trying to
find information about support of rpcgen in automake, but haven't succeed.
Search on [EMAIL PROTECTED] gives only some very strange letter, which is
discarded anyway as a not so good solution to the problem I do
Hi,
> But anyway, let's apply this patch, it is a basis for further
> changes. For instance we might implement --update which could wget
> the files if possible, and --report which could automatically send the
> message. We have already talked about this some time ago.
I'm happy to apply this
