-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 10:38 PM
To: Jim Meyering
Cc: Akim Demaille; Autoconf List
Subject: Re: Autoconf Extension Files
On Aug 3, 2000, Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we'll never be able to
"Bernard" == Bernard Dautrevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salut Bernard !
Bernard The problem with the current aclocal.m4, is that if I
Bernard "aclocal" and the package maintainer use some exotic macros I
Bernard don't know about, autoconf will just generate a configure
Bernard script that
--- Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We disagree on the room left in between. I think it should remain a
non Mike-Joe-Hans-Otto-Rand land, he thinks we should offer the means
to have both includes and inlines. I think it's way too many
complications, too much documentation to read,
Akim Demaille writes:
| configure --version:
| ,
| | Configure script for Toto 1.0, generated by Autoconf 2.14a.
| |
This is not right, the proper formatting should be what it is
currently:
% ./configure --version
configure (Toto 1.0) 2.14a
This is not right either. The
On Aug 4, 2000, Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Oliva writes:
The problem is that I don't agree that keeping multiple m4 files in
the source tree is a simpler and cleaner approach. I think
maintaining a single aclocal.m4 is simpler and cleaner.
I don't quite see how
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 6:40 PM
To: Akim Demaille; Bernard Dautrevaux
Cc: 'Alexandre Oliva'; Jim Meyering; Autoconf List
Subject: Re: Autoconf Extension Files
--- Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
