"Pavel" == Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pavel Hello! What version of Automake are we using to rebuild
Pavel Makefile.in's?
Pavel It must be a modified version since the stock Automake
Pavel hardcodes "gtar" and has a bug in the "distdir" target.
I use ``stock'' Automake 1.4 from
Hi People,
We are heading slowly towards the 2.50 release. There are still many
small details to fix in Autoconf, in particular the test suite which
Pavel is quickly improving. I think it is reasonable to aim at 2.49b,
a widely advertised beta, for the next couple of weeks.
Before 2.50, it
Akim Demaille writes:
"Russ" == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the subjects of
Russ incoming messages be turned off?
It should be ok by now.
I liked it... :-(
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
How portable is "mv -f" used in autoheader.sh? If it is, I believe we
should switch to using it everywhere to avoid any unwanted interactivity.
Otherwise, it should be replaced with "rm -f" and "cp".
Related question - how portable is "mv" across mount points, i.e. between
$TMPDIR and
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Akim Demaille writes:
"Russ" == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the subjects of
Russ incoming messages be turned off?
It should be ok by now.
I liked
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 08:17:18AM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
: On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
: Akim Demaille writes:
:
:"Russ" == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: Russ Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the subjects of
:
| On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 08:17:18AM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
| : On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
| : Akim Demaille writes:
| :
| :"Russ" == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| :
| : Russ Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
| : I liked it... :-(
| :
| : As did I. :-(
|
| I didn't. :-/
Stop growing this series of replies ;)
Right! :-)
Out of curiosity, are you guys receiving duplicate e-mails from the
list? I seem to be getting two copies
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 08:54:59AM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
: Out of curiosity, are you guys receiving duplicate e-mails from the
: list? I seem to be getting two copies of each e-mail sent from all of
: the GNU lists I'm subscribed to.
On the Guile user list, I've in the last couple of days
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:56:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Akim Demaille writes:
"Russ" == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Could the really annoying "feature" of mangling the subjects of
Russ incoming messages be turned off?
It should be ok by now.
--- Ossama Othman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiosity, are you guys receiving duplicate e-mails from the
list? I seem to be getting two copies of each e-mail sent from all of
the GNU lists I'm subscribed to.
Not all. Only some. Akim's posts are being repeated.
Cheers,
=
---
Hello!
I tried to run autoupdate on the following configure.in
AC_INIT
AC_LINK_FILES(a, b)
AC_OUTPUT
and it printed:
/tmp/au9096/input.m4:45: /usr/bin/m4: Non-numeric argument to built-in `0@0@h'
/tmp/au9096/input.m4:45: /usr/bin/m4: Cannot open [/tmp/au9096/disable.m4]: No such
file or
I'd like to have Autoconf generate makefile
dependencies for compilers other than gcc,
but I'm not familiar with the autoconf source
enough to find where it is done. Would someone
be kind enough to point me in the right direction?
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software
Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a pity that the Autoconf documentation gives hint about broken
functions only for functions that have their own AC_FUNC_FOO, likewise
for headers. If you know a function which should be AC_CHECK_FUNC'd or
AC_REPLACE_FUNC'd, please, submit so
From: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 Sep 2000 18:10:18 -0700
I believe that mv -f is fully portable. I think the only portable
options to mv are -f and -i.
I know that cp -f definitely *isn't* portable. I forget where it
misbehaved, but it was a bug report against
15 matches
Mail list logo
