> * Here is a small procmail receipt to ignore duplicate emails. Because of
> this I did not get multiple copies:
>
> :0 Wh: $PMDIR/msgid.lock
> | /usr/local/bin/formail -D 8192 $PMDIR/msgid.cache
This recipe is *dangerous* and can lead to loss of mail.
Re-read the procmailrc man page and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> >> Out of curiosity, are you guys receiving duplicate e-mails from the
> >> list? I seem to be getting two copies of each e-mail sent from all
> >> of the GNU lists I'm subscribed to.
>
> Earnie> Not all. Only some. Akim's posts are being r
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 02:42:40PM -0500, Robert Boehne wrote:
> For me this is getting ridicilous, I'm getting from
> 2 to 7 copies of each posting, not at the same time,
> sometimes over the period of a week. This didn't happen
> very often up until about three weeks ago.
> I'd give up my
Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For me this is getting ridicilous, I'm getting from 2 to 7 copies of
> each posting, not at the same time, sometimes over the period of a week.
> This didn't happen very often up until about three weeks ago. I'd give
> up my first born to have this fix
For me this is getting ridicilous, I'm getting from
2 to 7 copies of each posting, not at the same time,
sometimes over the period of a week. This didn't happen
very often up until about three weeks ago.
I'd give up my first born to have this fixed.
--
Robert Boehne Software Enginee
Hello, Mike!
> i've been trying to wrap autoconf around one of my projects (in progress).
> the problem is that my project relies heavily on Objective C. as i'm sure
> you know, there is no AC_LANG_OBJC macro :). i'm finding that for Objective
> C related things, i'm needlessly reimplementing
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see software that uses ANSI C function prototypes but tests for
> varargs.h vs. stdarg.h and chooses the right variadic argument syntax
> accordingly. Are there really ANSI C compilers that don't have stdarg.h?
No, but there were compilers that had f
--- start of forwarded message ---
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: mike burrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "mike burrell,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: proposal for autoconf languages
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 1
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 22 Sep 2000 14:19:51 -0700
What would be *truly* valuable from my perspective would be some
indication of when given headers showed up. For example, INN is still
faithfully checking for the existence of unistd.h and only including it
[ On , September 22, 2000 at 14:19:51 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Call for help on improving the documentation
>
> Interesting; I wasn't aware those functions existed. (INN does its own
> bit fiddling.) Where are they available again? They're not in BSDI 3.1,
> and I've not se
| On Sep 21, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > * autoconf.sh: Report full macro name for missing macros.
|
| Ok, except that
|
| > - match (\$0, /($pattern)[_A-Za-z0-9]*/)
| > + match (\$0, /([_A-Za-z0-9]*($pattern)[_A-Za-z0-9]*)/)
|
GET YOUR OWN 100 MEG WEBSITE FOR ONLY $11.95 PER MONTH TODAY!
STOP PAYING $19.95 or more TODAY for your web site, WHEN YOU CAN
GET ONE FOR ONLY $11.95 PER MONTH!
DO YOU ALREADY HAVE A WEBSITE? ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS TRANSFER THE
DOMAIN TO OUR SERVERS AND UPLOAD YOUR DATA AND YOU ARE READY TO
G
| Hello!
| Run this:
|
| TMPDIR=. autoupdate --debug /dev/null
| echo AC_INIT >configure.in
| grep -v ^_ au*/au.txt >>configure.in
| autoupdate
Brilliant!
| The result is truly scary. There are two AC_INIT's, four AC_DIAGNOSE's,
| one AC_REQUIRE outside macro definition, even one AC_C_CROSS!
13 matches
Mail list logo
