-Original Message-
From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Lars J. Aas; Bernard Dautrevaux; 'Mo DeJong'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why is srcdir passed as .
"Thomas" == Thomas E Dickey [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Lars J. Aas; Bernard Dautrevaux; 'Mo DeJong'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why is srcdir passed as .
You're right. I'm actually referring
Great! Thanks Alexandre!
| Direct use
| {One}
| {line}
| {Two
| lines}
OK.
| Indirect Use with Quotes
| {One line}
| {Two
| lines}
Not OK.
| Indirect Use without Quotes
| {One}
| {line}
| {Two
| lines}
OK.
This is the big problem I probably misunderstood (and diagnosed as
`quotes are
--- Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I am back to something I raised some time ago: why the heck do we
have to compile to recognize Mingw etc.? Can't we just uname? While
anti-Autoconf (and btw, frankly, compiling __MINGW32__ makes no big
difference to me), it seems better in
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 6:24 PM
To: Akim Demaille; Alexandre Oliva
Cc: Morten Eriksen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AC_PROG_CC not working
--- Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I am back to
--- Bernard Dautrevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to verify: You're talking of recognizing MinGW as a BUILD system, not
HOST, aren't you? uname will only give information about the BUILD system,
so if we plan to configure using a cross-compiler, uname will do no good :-)
AFAICT, uname
Is there a way to cleanly prevent these macros from setting
[C,F]FLAGS to "-g -O2" by default?
