"David" == David Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Akim, It is unchanged at this time.
Actually Autoconf was changed, but its ./configure was not.
David I can wait till tomorrow.
Good morning! :)
"Pavel" == Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
b=`false` || echo Ok It should print "Ok". If it doesn't, we
are in trouble.
We are in trouble - no response.
Pavel :-(
I concur.
Pavel Well, one consequence is that some errors will not be
Pavel detected. For example, missing
"Lars" == Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars The test suite takes hours on some systems ...
More than before?
Does anybody knows how to profile a shell script?
Lars Solaris 7, IRIX 6.3, DU 4.0F are fine.
Good news!
Lars HP-UX 9.05 says "All 174 tests were successful (2
| acversion.m4:
| # This file is part of Autoconf. -*- Autoconf -*-
| # Version of Autoconf.
| # Copyright 1999, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
| m4_define([AC_ACVERSION], [2.49b])
|
| acversion.m4.in:
|
| # This file is part of Autoconf.
| On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 07:59:57PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
| : Err, I think I should stop working on Autoconf right now:
| :
| : | for ac_file in `ls conftest.o conftest.obj conftest.* 2/dev/null`; do
| : | case $ac_file in
| : | *.o | *.obj ) ac_cv_objext=`expr
| How about doing something along the same lines for exeext:
|
| for ac_file in `ls conftest.exe conftest conftest.* 2/dev/null`; do
| case $ac_file in
| conftest )ac_cv_exeext=;;
| *.$ac_cv_object ... ) ;;
| *)ac_cv_exeext=`expr
"Pavel" == Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pavel Hello, David!
I haven't checked the code yet but the behavior seems to be that
the torture tests are requiring me to hit ctrl-D as the old suite
required on every test.
Pavel I don't think I have anything to do with this problem.
Hi Akim,
Beware! These are two different machines and OSs. The gzipped file I sent
you is for Solaris8/SPARC, while the plaintext test 80 is the *only*
failed test for BSDI3.1 . Please tell me if you want me to send you the
full error file for BSDI3.1 .
As for the Solaris8 tests, I will try to
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Daniele Arena wrote:
As for the Solaris8 tests, I will try to rerun them. Maybe I did something
wrong which blew all up?
Ehm... Sorry, but now there's something I don't get. Really. Is it in any
way possible that the tests give different results if run with different
"Harlan" == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harlan I suspect that AC_EGREP_CPP is using KR mode instead of ANSI
Harlan mode under HP-UX.
Harlan I have a test that attempts to determine how the C compiler
Harlan will catify tokens and it's botching with CC=cc under HP-UX.
Harlan I can't
On 30 Nov 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
Daniele As for the Solaris8 tests, I will try to rerun them. Maybe I
Daniele did something wrong which blew all up?
I don't think so. But I had the strange impression that some stuff
has be executed concurrently, and it should not have. But frankly,
"Daniele" == Daniele Arena [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniele Ehm... Sorry, but now there's something I don't
Daniele get. Really. Is it in any way possible that the tests give
Daniele different results if run with different shells?...
Sure! That would reveal bugs in Autotest. But it should
"Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexandre On Nov 30, 2000, Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| +./configure: 24794 Alarm call
This is why it failed: the shell complains of the signal it
received. I don't know how to address this issue.
Alexandre `grep -v
Here is what I'm applying.
Index: ChangeLog
from Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* doc/autoconf.texi (Systemology): New section.
Some about QNX 4.
2000-11-30 Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: doc/autoconf.texi
"Earnie" == Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Earnie HTH,
It does, thanks. But then, you are referring to EXEEXT as a *build*
feature, not a host feature.
Frankly, I think we will never end having problems until we introduce
the two sets. I can't see why EXEEXT and OBJEXT should be both
Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Alexandre On Nov 30, 2000, Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | +./configure: 24794 Alarm call
|
| This is why it failed: the shell complains of the signal it
| received. I don't know
I've applied what Lars suggested.
"Daniele" == Daniele Arena [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniele OK, I give up. I reran all the tests with plain Bourne shell,
Daniele and I obtained Yet Another Different Set of failed checks.
Good news :(
Daniele If you really want, I can send you the tests with sh, bash
Daniele and tcsh . But
"Lars J. Aas" wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:32:07PM -0800, David Morgan wrote:
: Pavel Roskin wrote:
: David, could you please test this:
:
: b=`false` || echo Ok
:
: It should print "Ok". If it doesn't, we are in trouble.
:
: We are in trouble - no response.
Just curious:
"Pavel" == Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pavel I don't know what "trap" you are talking about,
In the case we AC_MSG_ERROR.
Pavel but the testsuite fails after this patch because "conftest" is
Pavel not removed e.g. by AC_PROG_CC
Arg, I forgot to adjust my patch, I had noticed too
Please, could you try this:
(exit); echo $?
For bash, the answer is: yes - no. You have the different outputs, the
first I sent today marked "sparc-sun-solaris2.8.gz" and the one I just
sent. They were both generated with bash.
I didn't try again with the other shells. I can do it, but not at once.
Cheers,
D.
On 30 Nov 2000, Akim
"Daniele" == Daniele Arena [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniele I didn't try again with the other shells. I can do it, but
Daniele not at once.
No, don't, you'd waste your time. Thanks!
Let solve your issues one by one. Frankly, the fact that the results
are different with different shells is
Akim Demaille writes:
there is one side effect to this change: configure no longer says
checking for executable suffix... no
it says
checking for executable suffix...
Maybe you could put quotes around the result, otherwise it looks like
something is broken, IMHO.
--
Peter Eisentraut
"Peter" == Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Is there really an Autoconf mode for Emacs? Where can I get
Peter it?
I have it as part of XEmacs.
autoconf-mode.el
On 30 Nov 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
Remains a big problem: the test suite is not deterministic on your
system. Is it sane? Have you already tried to install a sane GNU
package on it? Does it work properly? Was Autoconf built on the same
machine too? Is it in /tmp or through NFS?
The
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 5:22 PM
To: Akim Demaille
Cc: Lars J. Aas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; APatche
Subject: Re: AC_OBJEXT again
--- Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Earnie" == Earnie Boyd [EMAIL
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 05:50:54PM +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
: Perhaps in fact we can write the test as:
:
: for ac_file in `ls conftest conftest.exe conftest.* 2/dev/null`; do
: case $ac_file in
: *.$ac_ext | *.o | *.obj | *.xcoff | *.tds) ;;
: conftest)
:
"Akim" == Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Akim Gimme a couple minutes :)
You can check now.
Index: ChangeLog
from Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* sh.m4 (AS_EXIT): Don't rely on false exiting 1.
Actually, always use `(exit $val); exit', don't try smart stuff.
"Pavel" == Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pavel It's a different bug. With ash, you shouldn't rely on $? after
Pavel assignments _unless_ backticks are used. In this case, you
Pavel cannot rely on $? _if_ backticks are used.
Index: ChangeLog
from Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 30 Nov 2000 09:48:35 +0100
Pavel I don't know how many times we rely on similar
Pavel constructs. There may be more serious problems. To fix them, we
Pavel should never use $? after _any_ assignments.
That's really bad in theory, I hope its
On 30 Nov 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
You can check now.
Last CVS sources checked out, test rerun (with sh;). There are still tests
failed (21 of them), but the "torture" one is not failed anymore. See
attached file.
Good night:)
Daniele.
check.new.sparc-sun-solaris2.8.gz
-Original Message-
From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:34 PM
To: Daniele Arena
Cc: Pavel Roskin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; APatche
Subject: FYI: AS_EXIT (Was: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes)
"Akim" == Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| # So we set $? by executing "exit N" in the subshell and then exit.
| # "false" is used for exit code 1 (default), ":" is used for 0
|
| Isn't this comment misleading now?...
It's been removed :)
"Daniele" == Daniele Arena [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniele Good night:)
Good night. Tomorrow I'll have a job for you :)
cd tests
mv testsuite testsuite.old
sed 's/cp -f/mv -f/' testsuite.old testsuite
chmod +x testsuite
./testsuite
Who knows... I find this state-ls stuff very suspicious,
No, I still have the problem, just as described.
H
---
| acversion.m4:
| # This file is part of Autoconf. -*- Autoconf
-*-
| # Version of Autoconf.
| # Copyright 1999, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
| m4_define([AC_ACVERSION], [2.49b])
|
|
I have to admit that I am a bit confused about
what is going on with the _AC_CYGWIN and
_AC_MINGW32 macros. I was under the
impression that they were required
for _AC_EXEEXT or _AC_OBJEXT, but
it seems like the addition of these
new patches will mean the obj and
exe extension will not need to
Hello!
Yes. I wouldn't bother doing that. Just tell them to get a working
shell. You have to draw the line somewhere.
That's correct. We cannot support command.com anyway :-)
If you want to quote chapter and verse, you can tell them that
POSIX.2-1992 section 3.9.1 page 136 lines 755-759
The problem went away after I flushed my build direcory and re-ran
configure.
H
Hello, Harlan!
The problem went away after I flushed my build direcory and re-ran
configure.
Congratulations!
It's always a good idea to start from scratch.
I wrongly assumed that you knew it, so it's my fault :-)
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
G'day, Pavel!
Hello, Harlan!
The problem went away after I flushed my build direcory and re-ran
configure.
Congratulations!
It's always a good idea to start from scratch.
I wrongly assumed that you knew it, so it's my fault :-)
My fault too - I go out of my way to make sure folks do
--- Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: Autoconf List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Guess what...
From: Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11 Aug 2000 14:58:43 +0200
... we finally have a snapshot! No, I really mean it! We have one!
Well,
42 matches
Mail list logo
