Glenn McGrath wrote:
Hi, im trying to make a project im involved with
(http://busybox.lineo.com/) more portable, specifically i want to make it
compile under GNU/Hurd as well as linux.
My initial thoughts were that autotools would be ideal, but busybox is an
unusal project and im unsure
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:47:17 -0400
Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn McGrath wrote:
Current build process goes roughly as follows, there is a manually
edited
config file (Config.h, not to be confused with the autotools config.h)
that
Since you're worried about portability then
Hello Glenn,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:53:03PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
1) all libbb files are compiled, however some have system calls that
obviously depend on the linux kernel (and other portability problems),
there needs to be a way to only compile functions that will work on the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:04:10AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hello Glenn,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:53:03PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
1) [...] there needs to be a way to only compile [libbb] functions that
will work on the target machine.
That is really autoconf's raison
Hi, Glenn!
Hi, im trying to make a project im involved with
(http://busybox.lineo.com/) more portable, specifically i want to make it
compile under GNU/Hurd as well as linux.
NetBSD and QNX (Neutrino and classic 4.x) would be the real challenge -
they are widely applied in embedded systems.
Hi, thanks for all your replies and suggestions, unfortunately i dont see a
clear path ahead. ill have to think longer on this.
Glenn
