Re: autoconf detecting STL

2007-09-02 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 18:17 +0530, Hrishikesh Muruk wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to check if STL is supported by the system and then > include the STL headers path in my include path. The term "STL" has been sufficiently misapplied at this point that it isn't an adequate descriptor for anything

Re: Multi options library

2007-09-02 Thread Baurzhan Ismagulov
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:53:48AM +0200, Roman Rumisek wrote: > Exists easy way to build multi option libraries (for example: with/without > debug feature) into different library names (for example: > liba_d.so and liba.so)? Many Debian packages build the production library and objcopy the debugg

Re: Multi options library

2007-09-02 Thread Jason Curl
Roman Rumisek wrote: Exists easy way to build multi option libraries (for example: with/without debug feature) into different library names (for example: liba_d.so and liba.so)? I can think of three things, the last one might be the most applicable. 1. I believe the libtool manual has some e

autoconf detecting STL

2007-09-02 Thread Hrishikesh Muruk
Hi I am trying to check if STL is supported by the system and then include the STL headers path in my include path. I used AC_CXX_HAVE_STL from the macro archive. So now my configure script checks for STL when run. How do I determine the path to the STL headers directory so that I can put

Multi options library

2007-09-02 Thread Roman Rumisek
Exists easy way to build multi option libraries (for example: with/without debug feature) into different library names (for example: liba_d.so and liba.so)? Thanx. Roman ___ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/