On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:46:49AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Axel Thimm wrote:
may be there are some hints whether people have already tried with
borland compilers.
Let's hope they are reading this list and will step forward to discuss it ;)
OT
sure - Borland
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:43:59PM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote:
I would recommended to use atleast gmake and (ba)sh which are both available
for win/dos, and having the complete gnu fileutils is not a bad idea either.
Yes, as a first step I was considering cygwin as a solid basis for sh/perl
sorry for the excessive addressing, but this topic touches all auto-tools.
I am in the process of convincing some people to move their Borland based
source code development to proprietary free models. As you may guess, this is
an extremly difficult task, requiring more pedagogical than technical
