Tom Tromey wrote:
Matt == Matt Schalit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt It's my conclusion that grep -e is the correct syntax.
Matt Too bad I can't get anyone at libtool to care, but as I mentioned
Matt I'm not running Linux.
`grep -e' is correct.
Or you can use something like
Tim Van Holder wrote:
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 08:51, Matt Schalit wrote:
I'm not experienced with enough platforms to tell why
line 5148 in libtool-1.4.2 configure doesn't call grep -e:
if { (eval echo configure:5149: \$archive_cmds 2\\1 \| grep \ -lc \ \
/dev/null 2\\1\) 15
I'm not experienced with enough platforms to tell why
line 5148 in libtool-1.4.2 configure doesn't call grep -e:
if { (eval echo configure:5149: \$archive_cmds 2\\1 \| grep \ -lc \ \
/dev/null 2\\1\) 15; (eval $archive_cmds 2\\1 \| grep \ -lc \ \/dev/n
ull 2\\1) 25; }
Doesn't grep -e
Stefan Illner wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Can anyone reproduce this behaviour, or, even better, tell me
why this occurs?
TIA,
stillner
I tried this using autoconf 2.50, m4-1.4, and gmake-3.79.1.
Autoconf ran fine. Configure ran fine, but gmake fails with
the error:
Makefile:3:
skyper wrote:
Hi
i updated to autoconf-2.50 and tried the following test
configure.in file:
# cat configure.inEOF
AC_INIT(test.c)
AC_PROG_CC
AC_OUTPUT(Makefile)
EOF
Your example worked on my system with gm4-1.4p and
autoconf 2.50. I used this for my configure.in:
Akim Demaille wrote:
"Matt" == Matt Schalit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt Thank you for the rapid reply and your suggestions, Akim.
You are welcome.
Frankly, I think your diagnostic is wrong somewhere.
1. The error message is clearly from GNU M4 (trust me, I
Hi Folks,
On Superbowl Sunday, I had a few hours to attempt compiling
the latest CVS gcc using cc, gnu-make, and the latest CVS autoconf.
That was a no-go.
Here's why I think it relates to autoconf. I pseudo-determined
that it was the cvs autoconf, so I replaced that (2.49d?) with
the 2.13.
Akim Demaille wrote:
| /* Define if you have the iconv.h header file. */
| #undef HAVE_ICONV_H"
| /usr/local/bin/m4: configure.in: 462: ERROR: Recursion limit of 250 exceeded, use
-LN to change it
|
|
|
| The
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jan 26, 2001, Matt Schalit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm concerned that the CVS version will have more bugs in it.
If it's not stable, then I thought it's not stable.
Maybe using yesterday's candidate release, just taken out of the CVS
tree, would make you
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jan 21, 2001, Matthew Schalit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this because I have no CXX or F77 at this point?
Quite likely. Would you give CVS autoconf a spin and see how it goes?
It should probably handle the lack of these programs more gracefully.
I'm
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jan 26, 2001, Matt Schalit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm concerned that the CVS version will have more bugs in it.
If it's not stable, then I thought it's not stable.
Maybe using yesterday's candidate release, just taken out of the CVS
tree, would make you
11 matches
Mail list logo
