Portability of find(1)

2001-09-18 Thread Akim Demaille
Hi People! I'm looking for information on the portability of find(1). Please, send me everything you know. In particular, I think I'm understanding that `{}' is portably replaced by the argument only when alone, i.e., exactly find ... {} ... and not find ... foo

Re: Portability of find(1)

2001-09-18 Thread Earnie Boyd
Akim Demaille wrote: Hi People! I'm looking for information on the portability of find(1). Please, send me everything you know. In particular, I think I'm understanding that `{}' is portably replaced by the argument only when alone, i.e., exactly find

Re: Portability of find(1)

2001-09-18 Thread Sascha Schumann
I'm looking for information on the portability of find(1). Please, send me everything you know. In particular, I think I'm understanding that `{}' is portably replaced by the argument only when alone, i.e., exactly '{}' can only be used portable, if it is a separate argument. Also

Re: Portability of find(1)

2001-09-18 Thread Paul Eggert
From: Sascha Schumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:00:11 +0200 (CEST) '{}' can only be used portably, if it is a separate argument. It's worse than that. Not only must '{}' be separate and not part of any other argument, it must not be followed by another argument '+'.