On 05/15/2013 05:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2012 08:46:57 Paul Wise wrote:
So, Debian is in the process of bringing up our upcoming arm64 port.
Unfortunately we are also coming across lots of packages with rather
outdated config.guess and config.sub files (see links
Hello,
On Tue, 14 May 2013 23:53:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
yes, Gentoo fixed this for every package in our tree like 9 years ago
(we added a common function like 11 years ago that ebuilds could call
manually, but we found that didn't scale). when you run a standard
autoconf script, we
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 09:54:08 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/15/2013 05:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2012 08:46:57 Paul Wise wrote:
So, Debian is in the process of bringing up our upcoming arm64 port.
Unfortunately we are also coming across lots of packages with rather
On 05/15/2013 06:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 09:54:08 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/15/2013 05:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2012 08:46:57 Paul Wise wrote:
So, Debian is in the process of bringing up our upcoming arm64 port.
Unfortunately we are
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 12:26:46 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/15/2013 06:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 09:54:08 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/15/2013 05:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2012 08:46:57 Paul Wise wrote:
So, Debian is in the process of
Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com writes:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 23:53:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
yes, Gentoo fixed this for every package in our tree like 9 years ago
(we added a common function like 11 years ago that ebuilds could call
manually, but we found that didn't
On 5/15/2013 11:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i understand the point you're making. however, ~10 years of building from
source in Gentoo and doing this for every single build has shown that in
practice, it's irrelevant.
It's irrelevant *for* *Gentoo*. Not all autoconfiscated source trees
are
On Wednesday 15 May 2013 15:25:31 Warren Young wrote:
On 5/15/2013 11:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i understand the point you're making. however, ~10 years of building
from source in Gentoo and doing this for every single build has shown
that in practice, it's irrelevant.
It's irrelevant
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
if Gentoo blowing away your rinky dinky config.sub hack breaks your
project, then take it as a sign that You're Doing It Wrong :).
I think this may be one of those historical momentum things. As INN
maintainer, I used to carry local patches to
+++ Thomas Petazzoni [2013-05-15 16:30 +0200]:
Hello,
On Tue, 14 May 2013 23:53:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
yes, Gentoo fixed this for every package in our tree like 9 years ago
(we added a common function like 11 years ago that ebuilds could call
manually, but we found that didn't
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:30 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 23:53:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
yes, Gentoo fixed this for every package in our tree like 9 years ago
FWIW, we do the same thing in Buildroot
Yes, it is a very common hack in all of the distros.
It would be
11 matches
Mail list logo
