Hello autoconfers.
There is any reason why the AS_BASENAME and AS_DIRNAME macros don't
have associated as_fn_* shells functions, like e.g. AS_MKDIR_P or
AS_UNSET do? If there is no such reason, you might find the attached
patch useful.
Regards,
Stefano
From
On 07/29/2010 05:15 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hello autoconfers.
There is any reason why the AS_BASENAME and AS_DIRNAME macros don't
have associated as_fn_* shells functions, like e.g. AS_MKDIR_P or
AS_UNSET do? If there is no such reason, you might find the attached
patch useful.
At Thursday 29 July 2010, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/29/2010 05:15 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hello autoconfers.
There is any reason why the AS_BASENAME and AS_DIRNAME macros
don't have associated as_fn_* shells functions, like e.g.
AS_MKDIR_P or AS_UNSET do? If there is no such
Committed as obvious. I've used something like
exec 50;
sed -n 's/.*Macro: *\([^ ]*\) .*/\1/p' autoconf.info* |
while read mac; do
info -f ./autoconf.info --index $mac 05;
done
to find out manually which macros were defined but without index entry.
There's probably a better way to
* doc/autoconf.texi (File Descriptors): Document issue with fd 10
and above.
Reported by Ralf Wildenhues.
---
ChangeLog |5 +
doc/autoconf.texi | 14 ++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 278a565..0ef1fd3
* doc/autoconf.texi (Limitations of Builtins) cd: Document
issues with empty argument.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
---
Pushing both of these, to address recent issues brought up on the list.
ChangeLog |6 ++
doc/autoconf.texi | 10 ++
2 files changed,
Hi Eric.
At Friday 30 July 2010, Eric Blake wrote:
* doc/autoconf.texi (File Descriptors): Document issue with fd 10
and above.
Reported by Ralf Wildenhues.
---
ChangeLog |5 +
doc/autoconf.texi | 14 ++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On 07/29/2010 05:48 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
+On the other hand, you can't portably use multi-digit file descriptors.
+Solaris @command{ksh} doesn't understand any file descriptor larger
+than @samp{9}:
+
FWIW, Solaris /bin/sh and /usr/xpg4/bin/sh don't understand it, too.
Is this worth
