a621f6fb03ee2ce45bafd882b17dafc9a8d0bdeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: a621f6fb03ee2ce45bafd882b17dafc9a8d0bdeb.1313693483.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:31:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] docs: other issues with parallel BSD
On 08/18/2011 12:51 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Perhaps specifying the OS release version the issue was noticed on
(not all-inclusive) or the date that the issue was noticed would be
sufficient? For example FreeBSD 8.2 rather than FreeBSD? or
FreeBSD (2011) rather than FreeBSD? The drawback
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OK, given your considerations, I've updated my patch with the attached
squash-in. The amended patch is attached too. Let me know if it is
good to apply now.
This seems much better to me.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us,
On Thursday 18 August 2011, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/18/2011 12:51 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OK, given your considerations, I've updated my patch with the attached
squash-in. The amended patch is attached too. Let me know if it is
good to apply now.
I think it's good enough now; go
: a60b30ea47b2cc36d0b85bbed94a106643fba745.1313513383.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:31:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] docs: other issues with parallel BSD make
Motivated by automake bug#9245:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
What is useful information today may become 'lore' in a few years so
it would be good to add additional data so that the reader (and
documentation maintainer) knows the vintage of the information.
That's a good point. Do you think it would be OK
