On 12/29/10 15:51, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>> Remember, this stuff is still in flux. I am rewriting it
>> as "doc-sections" and each section describes its format:
>>
>> doc-section = {
>> ds-type = "SEE ALSO"; // etc.
>> ds-format = man; // "texi", "mdoc", etc.
>> ds-text = <<- _EOF_
>>
Hi Bruce,
Bruce wrote:
> On 12/27/10 14:26, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > The following ramble is not fully thought-out.
> >
> > I was thinking about how I'd like to be able to support i18n of our
> > docs, specifically looking toward the stanzas in a .def file.
>
> I've gone to some trouble to try to
Hi Harlan,
On 12/27/10 14:26, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> The following ramble is not fully thought-out.
>
> I was thinking about how I'd like to be able to support i18n of our
> docs, specifically looking toward the stanzas in a .def file.
I've gone to some trouble to try to get the libopts messages
The following ramble is not fully thought-out.
I was thinking about how I'd like to be able to support i18n of our
docs, specifically looking toward the stanzas in a .def file.
While doing this, I also was again reminded that with Kapila's recent
work we can now expect to see things like 'prog-ma