Re: [Autogen-users] "stanza" processing, i18n, ...

2010-12-29 Thread Bruce Korb
On 12/29/10 15:51, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> Remember, this stuff is still in flux. I am rewriting it >> as "doc-sections" and each section describes its format: >> >> doc-section = { >> ds-type = "SEE ALSO"; // etc. >> ds-format = man; // "texi", "mdoc", etc. >> ds-text = <<- _EOF_ >>

Re: [Autogen-users] "stanza" processing, i18n, ...

2010-12-29 Thread Harlan Stenn
Hi Bruce, Bruce wrote: > On 12/27/10 14:26, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > The following ramble is not fully thought-out. > > > > I was thinking about how I'd like to be able to support i18n of our > > docs, specifically looking toward the stanzas in a .def file. > > I've gone to some trouble to try to

Re: [Autogen-users] "stanza" processing, i18n, ...

2010-12-29 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Harlan, On 12/27/10 14:26, Harlan Stenn wrote: > The following ramble is not fully thought-out. > > I was thinking about how I'd like to be able to support i18n of our > docs, specifically looking toward the stanzas in a .def file. I've gone to some trouble to try to get the libopts messages

[Autogen-users] "stanza" processing, i18n, ...

2010-12-27 Thread Harlan Stenn
The following ramble is not fully thought-out. I was thinking about how I'd like to be able to support i18n of our docs, specifically looking toward the stanzas in a .def file. While doing this, I also was again reminded that with Kapila's recent work we can now expect to see things like 'prog-ma