Custom make rules

2002-09-18 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Am Mit, 2002-09-18 um 23.23 schrieb Alexandre Duret-Lutz: > Please SHOUT LOUD if your package works with Automake 1.6.3 but > doesn't with 1.6d. Using custom compilations rules in a Makefile.am: # cat Makefile.am: ${ARCH}/%.$(OBJEXT): %.S test -d ${ARCH} || mkdir ${ARCH} ${CCASCO

.PHONY and 1.6d

2002-09-18 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Am Mit, 2002-09-18 um 23.23 schrieb Alexandre Duret-Lutz: > Please SHOUT LOUD if your package works with Automake 1.6.3 but > doesn't with 1.6d. I am experiencing many problems with autoconf-2.54+automake-1.6d with several packages which worked flawlessly with autoconf-2.54/automake-1.6.3. Actua

Alternitif, Bitkisel kanser ilici Carctol

2002-09-18 Thread biligi
charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset="US-ASCII"; charset

This conditional test fails in 1.6d

2002-09-18 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > Please SHOUT LOUD if your package works with Automake 1.6.3 but > doesn't with 1.6d. Well, my package doesn't. Here's the test (full test with copyright is attached): cat >>configure.in << 'EOF' AM_CONDITIONAL([USE_FOO], [true]) AC_PROG_CC EOF ca

Automake 1.6d available (beta for Automake 1.7)

2002-09-18 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Here is a snapshot of the current development version of Automake. This should become Automake 1.7 *soon*. How soon will depends on the feedback we get on this beta. Please get it, install it, test it, torture it. Please report any issue by mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, or (preferred) using the

Re: Bug in "distcheck" target?

2002-09-18 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > Roger> && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) DESTDIR=$$dc_install_base install \ > Roger> && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) DESTDIR=$$dc_install_base installcheck \ > Roger> && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) DESTDIR=$$dc_install_base uninstall \ > > Unfortunately `make installcheck' isn't expected to run in

Re: Rule for man pages in different languages?

2002-09-18 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Eike" == Eike Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Eike> I'd like to install these man pages seperately in Eike> different directories, (e. g. "/usr/share/man/it/man1/"). Eike> man_MANS does not seem to be suitable. Eike> How do I tell automake? Using _MANS you can't. Try using _D

Re: Bug in "distcheck" target?

2002-09-18 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Roger" == Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Roger> However, this makes one very big assumption: every Roger> installation directory will use $prefix as the path Roger> prefix. Yes. This way we make sure people can install the package with --prefix=/usr, --prefix=/opt, --pr

Bug in "distcheck" target?

2002-09-18 Thread Roger Leigh
I recently found a bug in the distcheck target: dc_install_base=`$(am__cd) $(distdir)/=inst && pwd` \ && cd $(distdir)/=build \ && ../configure --srcdir=.. --prefix=$$dc_install_base \ ^^ --with-

Re: .texi.pdf Makefile.am

2002-09-18 Thread Akim Demaille
> "W" == W L Estes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: W> On Wednesday, 18 September 2002,18:07 +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: >> Automake 1.7 includes the PDF generation. W> Can I ask how automake 1.7 will generate the pdf? texi2dvi --pdf W> and when do you expect a release? Soon, but I can't be m