N.A.B.R.C.
26 Bellevue
St-Anne-des-Lacs
Qc, Canada
J0R 1B0
450-224-9275
PRESS RELEASE
The Canadian Subsidy Directory is now available.
This publication contains more than 2600 listings of grants
and loans offered by government departments, foundations
and associations.
The American Grants and
| A number of times I have been bitten by missing backslashes at the end
| of lines. Automake does not warn. A typical example is:
|
| if !HasX11
| TESTS_X11_XFAIL_TESTS =
| tests/rwblob_XWD_bilevel.sh \
| tests/rwblob_XWD_gray.sh \
| tests/rwblob_XWD_pallette.sh \
| tes
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Gary> So does that simply mean that libtool objects can be correctly built
Gary> as subdir-objects without AM_PROG_CC_C_O? Sorry to bug you, just
Gary> making sure I understand why you made the patch the way you did...
The purpos
In the same place you subscribed to this list.
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/automake
Stephen
--
Stephen Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A number of times I have been bitten by missing backslashes at the end
of lines. Automake does not warn. A typical example is:
if !HasX11
TESTS_X11_XFAIL_TESTS =
tests/rwblob_XWD_bilevel.sh \
tests/rwblob_XWD_gray.sh \
tests/rwblob_XWD_pallette.sh \
tests/rwblob_
In a project which I particpate with there are certain compiler flags
that need to be removed from the CFLAGS because they cause problems with
the compiled code.
For example if with a imaginary compiler I had the flags:
CFLAGS="-a -b -c d"
For a large part of the project the CFLAGS are fine but
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 16:03, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Stephen" == Stephen torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Stephen> bash-2.05b$ autoconf --version
> Stephen> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
> Stephen> Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.
>
> The config.log yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salut Alexandre!
Welcome back. Hope you enjoyed your vacation :-)
On 7 Sep 2004, at 22:03, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
I just tri
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Xavier Décoret wrote:
On one of my machine, a full build tree that otherwise works well, gives me
the following weird problem:
shared libraries are installed without the .so extension ?!??!
Has anybody encountered this before? It used to work on this machine, I
I have seen thi
On one of my machine, a full build tree that otherwise works well, gives
me the following weird problem:
shared libraries are installed without the .so extension ?!??!
Has anybody encountered this before? It used to work on this machine, I
changed some stuff (that I cannot backtrace) and now it
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"sashan" == sashan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sashan> Hi
sashan> How do I execute a copy (cp) of some files once they are generated by
sashan> automake. The situation is I have a automake/autoconf/libtool
sashan> generated library that is loadable by python. l
>>> "sashan" == sashan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sashan> Hi
sashan> How do I execute a copy (cp) of some files once they are generated by
sashan> automake. The situation is I have a automake/autoconf/libtool
sashan> generated library that is loadable by python. libtool generates this
sasha
>>> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> I find that if I take a built directory tree which has already passed
Bob> make check', normally passes 'make distcheck' with flying colors, and
Bob> then do './config.status; make distcheck', make distcheck fails due to
Bob> the di
>>> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Bob> there is still a difference in the generated Makefile.in
Bob> files.
Good catch, thanks! I'm installing the following on HEAD and branch-1-9.
2004-09-07 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* automake.in (hand
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
>>>
I just tried to build cvs libtool with cvs auto* all from today, and get:
make all-recursive
Making all in .
>>> cd . && /bin/ksh /us
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Bob> Apparently when automake is executed to generate Makefile.in, some
Bob> saved information is OS-dependent. That is bad.
I'd love a diff between those two different Makefile.in, then.
My
>>> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> Dear list,
Bo> I am developing my project under linux. Except for the usual
Bo> automake/autoconf/libtool rules, I have some machine dependent rules in
Bo> Makefile.am to reduce compile time during development. Is there a way to
Bo> remov
>>> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Bob> Apparently when automake is executed to generate Makefile.in, some
Bob> saved information is OS-dependent. That is bad.
I'd love a diff between those two different Makefile.in, then.
[...]
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Stephen" == Stephen torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Stephen> bash-2.05b$ autoconf --version
Stephen> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
Stephen> Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.
The config.log you sent shows the output of Autoconf 2.13. If
you are running the above exa
>>> "Martin" == Martin MAURER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Martin> I thought about a noinst library, and this might be an option.
It is.
Martin> what i would like to have is a configure file in the
Martin> toplevel directory, which then checks the dependencies
Martin> for all the clie
>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Andreas> 2004-08-30 Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andreas> * automake.in ($PATH_PATTERN): Add `+'.
Committed. Thanks.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
* Thomas Degris wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:18:32AM CEST:
>
> I would like to know how do I install (by default) all the libraries in
> $prefix/lib/my_package instead of $prefix/lib.
2 Possibilities:
- Use pkglib_ instead of lib_ (preferred).
- Read up on the nobase_ prefix if your source t
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:18:32AM +0200, Thomas Degris wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know how do I install (by default) all the libraries in
> $prefix/lib/my_package instead of $prefix/lib.
Use pkglib_LIBRARIES or pkglib_LTLIBRARIES in your Makefile.am.
Hello,
I would like to know how do I install (by default) all the libraries in
$prefix/lib/my_package instead of $prefix/lib.
Thanks,
Thomas
25 matches
Mail list logo
