Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:15:31PM CET:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter. We are all losers with this: you waste your time
writing an answer
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter.
I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter on auto*.gnu.org lists, because
they tend to be
Ralf == Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter.
Ralf I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter.
I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter on auto*.gnu.org
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way
that
- some gnu.org lists but not all automatically exclude subscribers if
they are listed in To: or Cc:.
This is customizable, see the mailman options page.
Andreas.
--
Andreas
On January 11, 2005 06:16, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Another approach would be to put the subdir into SUBDIRS, but prevent
the target `all' from making the programs there:
[...]
Thank you! This is much better and cleaner than what I had proposed. This is
exactly what I needed.
--
Simon Perreault
In this case I looked at the list of people in the discussion, knew
they were all subscribed, and intentionally mailed only to the list. ;-)
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way
that
- some gnu.org
Here is a message I recently sent to an individual after observing
that they never CC'd the original poster. This seemed topical after
reading today's discussion.
Bob
Thanks very much for answering questions on the mailing lists. It
is appreciated. However I noticed today that you have not
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 07:01 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
I am trying to install automake 1.9.4 from source on my system. The system is a
Slackware 10.0.0 installation on a PII/233. I upgraded m4 to 1.4.2, and also
installed Diff Utils 2.8.1 from source.. Additionally, Bison 1.875 is
installed, from source I believe. Otherwise, all software is as it
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:39:16AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 07:01 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do
11 matches
Mail list logo
