Re: Post-Processing Step

2006-09-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Mike, * Mike Melanson wrote on Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:55:55AM CEST: Is there an easy, official way to add a post-processing step to a Makefile.am? Specifically, after the primary build target is linked via autotool magic, how can I specify an extra 'objcopy' command to be executed

install-local - uninstall-local

2006-09-29 Thread Akim Demaille
It would probably make sense to have a warning in case a Makefile.am has install-*-local rules but no uninstall-local. BTW, I must say I don't really understand why, at least to keep symmetry, all the install-*-local targets are mapped to a single uninstall-local one. That there is one is nice,

autotools FAQ (was: how to turn off shared library notice in output of make install?)

2006-09-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ dropping bug-libtool; apologies for the resend ] Assorted answers and corrections to your the first half of your proto FAQ: * Kent Boortz wrote on Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:00:12AM CEST: * General questions Q: When do I want to use aufoconf? When automake? When libtool? What

Re: Problem finding TPO dependency file

2006-09-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello John, * John Ling wrote on Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:43:56PM CEST: I am running on an IBM P690 SMP PowerPC64 running Linux 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL. The dependency style selected during configure was gcc3 (see output of configure below). There are no other errors prior to the one I sent. I

Re: Problem finding TPO dependency file

2006-09-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* John Ling wrote on Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:43:56PM CEST: shared/cpp/src/fasta/Fasta.cpp:192: fatal error: opening dependency file shared/cpp/src/fasta/.deps/Fasta.Tpo: No such file or directory compilation terminated. Wait... Does the Makefile.am file use quotes for the source

Re: autotools FAQ (was: how to turn off shared library notice in output of make install?)

2006-09-29 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, I haven't read the whole post, but I'd like to make a few quick comments: On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:34:42AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Q: The auto in the name of automake and autoconf, does this mean I can create the build environment on one platform and the build

Passing command lines in Makefile.am

2006-09-29 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi, Currently I'm trying to compile an application in fltk with autotools. I'm having an problem with my Makefile.am that I can't find solution on the web. The problem is that fltk must be application that uses fltk API must be linked against the fltk library, but for this they give an command

Re: Passing command lines in Makefile.am

2006-09-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Pedro, * Pedro Sousa wrote on Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 01:22:38PM CEST: fltk2-config --cxxflags - gives the compile command options fltk2-config --ldflags- gives the linking command options For this I supposed that I could make a simple Makefile.am like this

Re: autotools FAQ

2006-09-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Stepan, * Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:33:19PM CEST: On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:34:42AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Automake is there to help you create portable makefiles. Thank you, Ralf, this is true, of course. But from a more theoretical standpoint, the

Re: Problem finding TPO dependency file

2006-09-29 Thread John Ling
Hi Ralf, I'll send you a tar of the package separately. To answer your questions: sed --version reports GNU sed version 4.1.2 The environment variable POSIXLY_CORRECT is not set. The shared/cpp/src/fasta/.deps does not exist after running configure. And yes the Fasta.Plo contains only #