* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:52:30AM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Brooks Moses wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:19:21PM CET:
This resulted in the error quoted in the subject line, automake does not
support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally, followed by an
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:03:47PM CET:
2007-11-05 Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Implement colorized test output.
* automake.in (handle_tests): Set COLOR
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- with TERM=vt100, on my GNU/Linux system there are still colors
generated by tput, so I did not use that TERM setting,
That is discouraging. The vt100 does not support color and tput
should not produce escape sequences for it. I believe that would
indicate a bug in
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Brooks,
* Brooks Moses wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:19:21PM CET:
This resulted in the error quoted in the subject line, automake does not
support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally, followed by an Internal
Error.
Hmm, something got stuck there:
* Al Pacifico wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:31:08PM CET:
On Nov 7, 2007 10:26 PM, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Al Pacifico wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:27:41PM CET:
What is the best way to distribute data files for use with the check
target?
[...]
overbored [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do I tell automake not to pass -I. to g++/gcc? Thanks in advance.
(The problem is that this project has a string.h, which conflicts with
the standard string.h. Besides, why -I. in the first place? Is it
because some people prefer #include blah over
Hello,
* J.T. Conklin wrote on Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:48:04AM CET:
overbored [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do I tell automake not to pass -I. to g++/gcc? Thanks in advance.
Use the nostdinc option:
http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Options
