Re: Trying to improve our dependency tracking

2008-05-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello James, * James Willenbring wrote on Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:51:11PM CEST: > When I add > > myexe_DEPENDENCIES = $(PACKAGEA_DEPENDENCIES) > > $(PACKAGEA_DEPENDENCIES) is not resolved before dependencies are checked. > Despite the fact that I put the include directive at the top of the > Mak

packaging release and debug builds in the same RPM package

2008-05-05 Thread Olivier Langlois
I have already found partly the answer in your archive at: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2001-03/msg00133.html Now that I am able to build these 2 versions of my libs into separate subdirectories, I would like to suffix the library names with 'd'. For instance, in my Makefile.am fi

Re: How to install doxygen-generated HTML documentation?

2008-05-05 Thread Peter Simons
Hi Stepan. > Another way is to do all the necessary work manually: defining > install-data-local, uninstall-local, etc. That should be safer. Thank you for the recommendation. I tried it. Both 'dist' and 'install' work fine with those local hooks, but unfortunately 'distcheck' won't. Best reg

Re: How to install doxygen-generated HTML documentation?

2008-05-05 Thread Stepan Kasal
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 01:08:16AM +0200, Peter Simons wrote: > Warren Young writes: > > dist_pkgdata_DATA = html/* > > When I try that, I get the following error message: > | make[1]: *** No rule to make target `html/*', needed by `all-am'. Stop. well, that's because all-local is not hooked t

Re: BUILT_SOURCES doesn't seem to work

2008-05-05 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Bobby, a few comments: On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:38:08PM -0700, Bobby Dill wrote: > When I try to compile my app, I get a message stating that sigcreatedlg.h > does not exist, so the files in BUILT_SOURCES are not generated before the > rest of my app is compiled. What's the right way to

Re: patch and dist rules

2008-05-05 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Jack, a few humble ideas: On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 05:59:44PM -0700, Jack Bates wrote: > patch: patch-stamp > patch-stamp: patches/* > cat patches/* | patch -p0 > > touch $@ Please note that this rule is not perfect; when one of the patches is deleted, the rule does not notice