I attached a new version of the patch. Please note that it still
doesn't address the remarks and objections made in the present mail.
At Tuesday 13 October 2009, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Stefano,
I understand. But what about instead susbstituting everywhere
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
The problem is verifying correctness of building packages in batches.
i.e. to monitor/inspect CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS etc. in compiler calls etc.
for correctness
(NB: A package, which compiles without warning doesn't mean it is being built
On 10/13/2009 04:49 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
The problem is verifying correctness of building packages in batches.
i.e. to monitor/inspect CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS etc. in compiler
calls etc. for correctness
(NB: A package, which compiles
Hi,
I want to create a library for the GNU-Modula compiler. But the
libraries are pure object files in a separate directory. Some kind of
package.
Is there a target for this?
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Corsepius on 10/13/2009 9:20 AM:
What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at
configure time or V=1 at make time?
Exactly this is the problem.
The problem isn't the support for silent rules. The problem is
On 10/14/2009 02:58 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Corsepius on 10/13/2009 9:20 AM:
What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at
configure time or V=1 at make time?
Exactly this is the problem.
The problem isn't
William,
I did a lot of what you are talking about when I was there - do you have
access to any of the ATC stuff?
H
Probably not, but I could poke around and see.
I suspect I ultimately need to grab someone from our build team and get
them to escalate this to MontaVista; I thought I'd try on a few mailers
first and see if I might get a response without going through multiple
layers of indirection. :-P
Ralph:
Hello Martin,
* Martin Kalbfuß wrote on Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:21:13PM CEST:
I want to create a library for the GNU-Modula compiler. But the
libraries are pure object files in a separate directory. Some kind of
package.
Is there a target for this?
No. But if you write the compile rules
[ dropping autoconf@ ]
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:20:30PM CEST:
On 10/13/2009 04:49 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
The problem is verifying correctness of building packages in batches.
i.e. to monitor/inspect CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS,
Hey,
in a subdirectory, we generate a file. First we want to delete it, then
fill it with . So we use that rule:
$(builddir)/eina_amalgamation.c: $(sources_used) Makefile
-rm -f $(builddir)/eina_amalgamation.c
(it is followed by the creation of the file)
With automake 1.10 or 1.11,
11 matches
Mail list logo
