Re: default -g ??!?

2010-11-22 Thread Warren Young
On 11/20/2010 1:05 PM, MK wrote: I do not think the exception (a need for debugging) should make the rule (general use, production grade software). I'd bet 99%+ of the time those compiled in debugging symbols never even get used a single time. The black box on an airplane doesn't get much

Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe

2010-11-22 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Dave Hart wrote on Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:34:47AM CET: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 22:44 UTC, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Vincent Torri wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:14:23PM CET: If I

Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping

2010-11-22 Thread Karl Berry
it addresses an issue that some people may not know about, so maybe it would be good to briefly explain further? I agree, thanks. I changed the text to look like this: By default, the Make rules should compile and link with @samp{-g}, so that executable programs have debugging