Hi Robert,
* Robert Collins wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:57:44AM CET:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'll throw a couple of suggestions for Autotools out there:
1) Interfacing with the Test Anything Protocol (TAP) (or maybe another
test protocol?).
I've
On Tuesday 08 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Robert,
* Robert Collins wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:57:44AM CET:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'll throw a couple of suggestions for Autotools out there:
1) Interfacing with the Test Anything
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know how the GSoC proposals are evaluated, but if reviewers tend
to prefer more precise goals, extending the proposal in this way might
not be a smart move. Maybe something like the following would be
On Tuesday 08 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know how the GSoC proposals are evaluated, but if reviewers tend
to prefer more precise goals, extending the proposal in this way might
not be a
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:50:47PM CET:
On Tuesday 08 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
``Interfacing with the Test Anything Protocol (TAP). If possible, try
to write an implementation that will allow
On Wednesday 09 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:50:47PM CET:
On Tuesday 08 March 2011, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
``Interfacing with the Test Anything Protocol (TAP). If
