On 02/03/2013 09:33 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Reference:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13435
On 01/28/2013 02:55 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 01/23/2013 01:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I've pushed my attempt to the public rewindable branch
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
Thanks!
tags 13435 + moreinfo patch
thanks
On 03/05/2013 08:43 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
OK. I just find it a
On 2013-03-05 14:43 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
FWIW I tried to setup a DOS/DJGPP environment for testing
On 02/03/2013 09:33 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Reference:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13435
On 01/28/2013 02:55 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 01/23/2013 01:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I've pushed my attempt to the public rewindable branch
On 02/23/2013 06:47 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 02/14/2013 11:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OK, done. If there are no further objections, I will soon proceed to
re-write the experimental/preproc branch once again with the latest
version of these patches;
This has been done already.
tags 13435 + moreinfo patch
thanks
On 03/05/2013 08:43 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
OK. I just find it a
On 2013-03-05 14:43 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
FWIW I tried to setup a DOS/DJGPP environment for testing
Basically, they are not really prototypes, but rather a trick to have
user-defined subroutines that behave more similarly to perl built-in
functions, by allowing them to be called without parentheses and to
impose context on their argument. Such semantics can be useful in some
selected
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
Thanks!
Hi Pavel.
On 03/05/2013 02:56 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Dear Stefano, sorry for so late response,
On 12/30/2012 10:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 29/12/2012 21:43, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
On 12/29/2012 08:46 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 29/12/2012 17:32, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
Dear Stefano, sorry for so late response,
On 12/30/2012 10:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 29/12/2012 21:43, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
On 12/29/2012 08:46 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 29/12/2012 17:32, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
* configure.ac: Here. The latter has been removed in
On 02/28/2013 08:59 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
[SNIP]
A second rewrite undoing (quotes here since the rewrite can't be
undone, and me and probably others as well will have to adjust the
local repo a second time) the first is probably the lesser evil,
even if it is another branch rewrite.
It
On 02/28/2013 09:12 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
So we should maybe go (after the next major release) with this naming
scheme for the branches?
* maint - for next micro version
* stable - for next minor version
* master - for next major
14 matches
Mail list logo
