On 05/12/2013 06:29 AM, Michael Zucchi wrote:
Hi again,
I (mostly) just have an observation to add to the bug tracker discussion
on the dependency generation.
Using $? will not suffice as a dependency check, as it's trivially easy
to create an example which will compile ok after a change
Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
On 05/12/2013 06:29 AM, Michael Zucchi wrote:
Hi again,
I (mostly) just have an observation to add to the bug tracker discussion
on the dependency generation.
Using $? will not suffice as a dependency check, as it's trivially easy
to
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Rhys Ulerich rhys.uler...@gmail.com wrote:
I gather that 'make install-strip' installs and then strips binaries.
Is there some variant that reverses the order? If not, any
recommendations for how to write one in an Automake-compliant manner?
My unstripped
On 05/12/2013 06:29 AM, Michael Zucchi wrote:
Hi again,
I (mostly) just have an observation to add to the bug tracker discussion
on the dependency generation.
Using $? will not suffice as a dependency check, as it's trivially easy
to create an example which will compile ok after a change
Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com writes:
On 05/12/2013 06:29 AM, Michael Zucchi wrote:
Hi again,
I (mostly) just have an observation to add to the bug tracker discussion
on the dependency generation.
Using $? will not suffice as a dependency check, as it's trivially easy
to
On 05/08/2013 02:12 AM, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
I gather that 'make install-strip' installs and then strips binaries.
Is there some variant that reverses the order? If not, any
recommendations for how to write one in an Automake-compliant manner?
Hi Rhys,
I'm tempted to believe the DESTDIR
On 13/05/13 02:28, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 05/12/2013 06:29 AM, Michael Zucchi wrote:
Using $? will not suffice as a dependency check, as it's trivially easy
to create an example which will compile ok after a change but create a
broken jar. e.g. add a new abstract method to an abstract
