/texi2dvi: line 733: cd:
/machine/netcdf/n4_new6/man4/netcdf.t2d/dvi/bak: No such file
or directory
make[1]: *** [netcdf.dvi] Error 1
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- e...@unidata.ucar.edu
libnetcdf_la_LIBADD += -lmfhdf -ldf -ljpeg
endif # USE_HDF4
if USE_SZIP
libnetcdf_la_LIBADD += -lsz
endif # USE_SZIP
LDADD += -lhdf5_hl -lhdf5 -lz
if USE_PNETCDF
LDADD += -lpnetcdf
libnetcdf_la_LIBADD += -lpnetcdf
endif
Is there a better way to do this?
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- e...@unidata.ucar.edu
()
{
return 42;
}
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not working. Anyone who can suggest what I am doing
wrong here would be very helpful...
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
=
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
The make version on cygwin is:
sh-3.1$ make --version
GNU Make 3.80
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Which seems reasonably recent. What's up with this? Is this kind of
thing only handled by newer makes?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett
. But this will be dorky, because I still have
to install built docs...
Any thoughts appreciated...
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subdirs? Or must this
be done in each directory's Makefile.am?
Is there some more automakeish way to handle this situation?
Thanks and Happy Thanksgiving to all U.S.A. readers!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Thanks, and thanks for the fine freeware too!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yet, but I
suppose it could be solved at the same time as the inter-makefile
library-installation-order issue is solved.
Well, no need to get too fancy.
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in EXTRA_DIST as well.
Yep, you sure hit it that time! Works like a charm now!
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:04:13PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Ed Hartnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like the best plan would be to add a flag to configure
that indicates you want to build docs, like --with-build-docs using
it to rebuild the
files, just to install the ones I've already shipped.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, man3f, and man3f90.
But according to automake the only valid extensions are 1 through 9,
l, and n.
Is there a way to get automake to create man3f0, and install my F90
API man page there?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:22:40PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* John Wohlbier wrote on Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:12:57PM CEST:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/~checkout~/config/config/config.guess
http
that there is a file I would like installed,
but not specially built nor included in the distribution?
I'm sure there is something very easy I am missing here...
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is constructing the shell script wrappers which
make the EXEEXT unneeded.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on the
web site.
It seems like the best thing would be if there was a way to turn off
this directory renaming. Is that possible?
If not, how have other users of texinfo docs managed this?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. This works if I supply TEMP_LARGE on the command line with the
make command, but it doesn't pick up the TEMP_LARGE defined during
configure.
So how do I take TEMP_LARGE and get it into one of my test programs?
Any suggestions welcome.
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, including telling me somehow whether it can handle F90
code.
Is there a better way? Or is it required that I have AC_PROG_F77 and
AC_PROG_FC?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$file' with sed to parse the output for the
file size?
If so, do we have to check for the existence of ls and sed during the
configure? Or is going to be found everywhere?
Or is there some more clever way to check the size of a file?
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed
Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EH == Ed Hartnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EH Should we just use 'ls -l $file' with sed to parse the output for the
EH file size?
Depending on how portable you want to be, getting the size out of ls -l
will not be as easy as it seems: see
?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
used the SOURCES primary? Like this:
tst_h_files_SOURCES tst_h_files.c ../nc_test.h
tst_h_atts_SOURCES tst_h_atts.c ../nc_test.h
etc.
Any suggestions would be welcome!
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Hartnett wrote:
Howdy all!
I am using automake to build my library, and I have a slew of test
programs:
# These programs are all built for make check in this directory.
check_PROGRAMS = tst_h_files tst_h_atts tst_h_vars tst_h_grps
$@ $(FCFLAGS_f90) $
as you suggested. Unfortunately, that didn't seem to help libtools tag
problem.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-alpha10/_build/libsrc'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `dvi'.
...
Is there a way to turn this off?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for texi2dvi?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) comes out
with its next version, sometime next year. How long until libtool 2.0
comes out in beta?
Thanks for the help, you've given me a lot to try!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 02:18:40AM CET:
What am I missing here? I define the following in my Makefile.am:
# Point the fortran compiler to current directory.
AM_FFLAGS = -I$(srcdir)
But no matter what I do, that -I
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:52:01PM CET:
My current problem is that I have some reference netCDF files, which
ship with the distribution. I also have a test program, which produces
data files that need to be identical
from make dist?
Is this what the user see when he unpacks my package - a bunch of
read-only files?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
without a whole extra shell script!
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my many configuration and test
files, trying to get everything to be more well-behaved, in the hopes
that this might clear up some of the problems I'm having on other
platforms...
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howdy all!
Is there any way to set an automake variable in the top-level automake
file? (That is, the file which contains SUBDIRS = ...)
I find myself setting AM_CFLAGS=-g in many subdirectories. Also I am
setting AM_LDFLAGS everywhere to point to a library directory that the
user can specify
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:57:44PM CET:
Is there any way to set an automake variable in the top-level automake
file? (That is, the file which contains SUBDIRS = ...)
I find myself setting AM_CFLAGS=-g in many
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--version
aclocal (GNU automake) 1.9.5
bash-3.00$ autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
bash-3.00$ m4 --version
GNU M4 1.4.3
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:57:26AM CEST:
I am trying to install automake and an OSF1 system. I just installed
autoconf, but the automake configure hangs looking for it...
*snip*
checking whether autoconf is installed
... /usr/bin/perl
checking for tex... no
checking whether autoconf is installed... yes
checking whether autoconf works...
And there it sits, until I kill it.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tst_h_strings.h5 tst_h_converts.h5 \
tst_h_dimscales.h5 tst_h_dimscales2.h5 tst_lists.nc tst_dims.nc \
tst_files.nc tst_vars.nc tst_unlim_vars. nc tst_atts.nc \
tst_converts.nc tst_grps.nc tst_compounds.nc tst_vl.nc tst_opaque.nc\
tst_strings.nc
--
Ed Hartnett
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:15:08PM CEST:
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 07:28:38PM CEST:
I have a slew of test programs, and my Makefile.am contains something
like this:
# These programs are all built
a long list, and I am wondering if there is any easy way to
specify that they *all* depend on tests.h, instead of listing it for
each.
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Using a convenience library made it work great.
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Makefile:375: .deps/var.Plo: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `.deps/var.Plo'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ed/netcdf-3/libsrc'
make: *** [
distclean-recursive] Error 1
I've got no clue what's going on here.
Anyone seen this before?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett
the output in the netcdf directory,
but automake has inserted some commands into the makefile to copy that
to netcdf.html.
Why?
Can I stop it?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:09:05PM CEST:
If I have some tests, and want to run them with command line options,
how do I do it?
You are using the Automake builtin support for tests. It's quite
limited, and I believe
command
line options.
check_PROGRAMS = tst_parallel
TESTS = run_par_test.sh
Where run_par_test.sh is:
MP_TASKS_PER_NODE=4 MP_PROCS=4 poe ./tst_parallel
This works, but is there a way to do this in the Makefile.am, and not
use a shell script?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the correct order.
Any comments or observations would be helpful.
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
autoconf 2.59 is used. Is there
a similar macro for automake?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the
automatic dependency tracking.
Is there a good solution to this problem?
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ed, Ralf,
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 07:39:48AM CET:
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 09:42 -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
Howdy all!
I'm a developer working on netCDF, a freeware library for climate and
Earth scientists
specify -M or -MM?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks!
--
Ed Hartnett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
52 matches
Mail list logo