autotools + MSVC

difference. --- Geoffrey Wossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More an autopackage

sion numbers as well as packages) I assume this requires coorperation with the underlying platform packager? --- Geoffrey Wossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More an autopackage

bly also be willing to install Python or Perl to get the features. --- Geoffrey Wossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More an autopackage

scripts and so forth. This would be analogous to autoscan producing a basic configure.in that the developer then customizes. --- Geoffrey Wossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

More an autopackage

need some help with the packaging details. 6) When I get going with Actual Code (TM) (within a couple of weeks), I'll setup a project on sourceforge for this. And finally, thanks to everyone who responded to my initial post. --- Geoffrey Wossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OS-sympathetic installation

stuff in the past week (check the archive), and I just posted my plans about 5 minutes ago. --- Geoffrey Wossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More an autopackage

got started. Thanks. --- Geoffrey Wossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package support (RPM, deb, pkg, kits, etc.)

are the best software build tools around. With platform packaging support, nobody would ever want to use anything else. --- Geoffrey Wossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]