Re: Expressing dependencies

2004-01-05 Thread Laurence Finston
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Robert Collins wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 03:53, Laurence Finston wrote: > > > This is essentially what I tried to do by using the auxiliary program > > `3DLDFcpl' in the rule for building the executable `3dldf' (roughly): > > > > 3

Re: Expressing dependencies

2004-01-04 Thread Laurence Finston
Robert Collins wrote: --- > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 08:17, Laurence Finston wrote: > > > The problem is that make makes certain assumptions that don't apply when CWEB > > is used. > > I think thats an incorrect statement. It would be more accurate t

Expressing dependencies

2004-01-03 Thread Laurence Finston
a general mechanism for expressing dependencies in Automake, similar to my auxiliary program. It could be programmed in C using bit-fields rather than in C++ using bitsets, if necessary. Laurence Finston 3DLDF maintainer Website: http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~lfinsto1 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 3DLDF (fwd)

2003-11-18 Thread Laurence Finston
Thanks for your help. I've got `make dist' to work. I need to check the other required targets, but I think I'll be able to get things working now. Laurence Finston

Re: 3DLDF (fwd)

2003-11-16 Thread Laurence Finston
st, and make fails when it can't find them. This happened with 3dldf.info*. The easiest solution would be to override the dist target. Is this possible after all? Laurence Finston On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > | Another possibility is to use a stamp

Re: 3DLDF (fwd)

2003-11-14 Thread Laurence Finston
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:38:41 +0100 (MET) From: Laurence Finston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [