On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:08:58 +0200, Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably not. You are fighting against all the bugs and misfeatures that
have been fixed over the last five years of automake development if you
insist on staying with automake-1.4 (I branched for the 1.4px series in
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Haude wrote:
> What can one say about this? I don't get it.
>
> Thanks,
> --Daniel
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Projects/ctops$ make distclean
> Making distclean in .
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dh/Projects/ctops'
> rm -f config.h
> rm -f TAGS ID
> rm -f Makefile
> rm -f
Hello,
> What can one say about this? I don't get it.
I'm afraid your mail does not contain enough information for any
reasonable answer.
Can the project be downloaded somewhere?
Could you post gui/Makefile.am?
Which version of Automake was used?
Stepan
What can one say about this? I don't get it.
Thanks,
--Daniel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Projects/ctops$ make distclean
Making distclean in .
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dh/Projects/ctops'
rm -f config.h
rm -f TAGS ID
rm -f Makefile
rm -f config.cache config.log stamp-h stamp-h[0-9]*
make[1]: L