Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime

2012-08-23 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 23/08/2012 10:36, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto: On 08/22/2012 12:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: How would you diagnose a typo in here at Automake runtime? bin_PROGRAMS = $(call user-func,args) bin_PROGRAMS += $(if $(ON-CYGWIN),baz) ifdef ON-CYGWIN # Oops, this was meant to

Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime

2012-08-23 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 08/22/2012 12:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: So I took a closer look at the whitelisting problem that was reported in GNU Smalltalk. The piece of code that was removed in Automake-NG is: foreach my $primary ('SOURCES', 'LIBADD', 'LDADD', 'LDFLAGS', 'DEPENDENCIES') { foreach

Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime

2012-08-23 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 23/08/2012 10:36, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto: On 08/22/2012 12:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: How would you diagnose a typo in here at Automake runtime? bin_PROGRAMS = $(call user-func,args) bin_PROGRAMS += $(if $(ON-CYGWIN),baz) ifdef ON-CYGWIN # Oops, this was meant to

The future of Automake-NG (was: Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime)

2012-08-23 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 08/23/2012 11:07 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: [MEGA-SNIP] So basically you want a version of Quagmire that supports configure.ac. Are you sure it isn't simpler to start from scratch? Serious question... Yes, I'm quite convinced that going through this admittedly more painful