On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
* warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
Turns out this has already been done for ages (at least since 2003).
I'll just remove support for it in Automake 1.13. See the patch
below.
OK?
Regards,
Stefano
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
* warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
Turns out this has already been done for ages (at least since 2003).
I'll just remove
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
* warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
Turns out this
Il 22/08/2012 23:52, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
I'd much rather a mandatory noisy warning period before a feature is
completely removed.
This would require a new category of warnings that are are unconditionally
show, regardless of strictness or any -Wnone option. As usual, patches
On 08/22/2012 03:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OTOH, I believe developers working on older systems should be ready to
install more recent developer tools once in a while. You can't truly
expect not to update your Automake installation for 3, 4 years!
Oh, _I_ fully wish that RHEL 5 would at
On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
* warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
Turns out this has already been done for ages (at least since 2003).
I'll just remove support for it in Automake 1.13. See the patch
below.
OK?
Regards,
Stefano
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
* warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
Turns out this has already been done for ages (at least since 2003).
I'll just remove
On 22/08/2012 12:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
What about first making the warning visible always, not just with
-Wobsolete? And add to the message that support will be removed in
1.14.
+1
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
* warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
Turns out this
On 08/22/2012 09:12 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
From 54a49542d417850e646fefe7bad56546a2362449 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
54a49542d417850e646fefe7bad56546a2362449.1345648257.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012
On 08/22/2012 10:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/22/2012 09:12 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
From 54a49542d417850e646fefe7bad56546a2362449 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
54a49542d417850e646fefe7bad56546a2362449.1345648257.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
From: Stefano Lattarini
Il 22/08/2012 23:52, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
I'd much rather a mandatory noisy warning period before a feature is
completely removed.
This would require a new category of warnings that are are unconditionally
show, regardless of strictness or any -Wnone option. As usual, patches
On 08/22/2012 03:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OTOH, I believe developers working on older systems should be ready to
install more recent developer tools once in a while. You can't truly
expect not to update your Automake installation for 3, 4 years!
Oh, _I_ fully wish that RHEL 5 would at
13 matches
Mail list logo
