Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG

2012-08-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
[Adding the Automake and Automake-NG lists in CC] Reference: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-smalltalk/2012-08/msg00032.html On 08/21/2012 11:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 21/08/2012 11:22, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto: Cool, let's look at it one by one. * configure.ac

[Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG)

2012-08-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 08/21/2012 12:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 21/08/2012 12:10, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto: (AC_SUBST): Define AM_VARTYPOS_WHITELIST to LIBFFI_EXECUTABLE_LDFLAGS RELOC_LDFLAGS. This is required because Automake-NG is stricter than mainline Automake in its make runtime checks on possible

Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG

2012-08-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
[Adding the Automake and Automake-NG lists in CC] Reference: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-smalltalk/2012-08/msg00032.html On 08/21/2012 11:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 21/08/2012 11:22, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto: Cool, let's look at it one by one. * configure.ac

Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG

2012-08-21 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 21/08/2012 12:10, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto: (AC_SUBST): Define AM_VARTYPOS_WHITELIST to LIBFFI_EXECUTABLE_LDFLAGS RELOC_LDFLAGS. This is required because Automake-NG is stricter than mainline Automake in its make runtime checks on possible typos in variables like 'foo_SOURCES' and

Automake vs. Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG)

2012-08-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 08/21/2012 12:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 21/08/2012 12:10, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto: (AC_SUBST): Define AM_VARTYPOS_WHITELIST to LIBFFI_EXECUTABLE_LDFLAGS RELOC_LDFLAGS. This is required because Automake-NG is stricter than mainline Automake in its make runtime checks on possible