Re: AM_CONDITIONAL and config.status

2002-02-02 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Roger" == Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Roger> OK. I though that in the past I could only have one line between Roger> if-endif or if-else or else-endif. It has always worked to put a lot of stuff inside the condition. Tom

Re: AM_CONDITIONAL and config.status

2002-02-02 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 11:07:15AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "Roger" == Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Roger> in Makefile.in, is it safe to use this format in my own .in files (e.g. > Roger> po/POTFILES.in), or will the format used for the conditionals in .in > Roger> files ch

Re: AM_CONDITIONAL and config.status

2002-02-02 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Roger" == Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Roger> in Makefile.in, is it safe to use this format in my own .in files (e.g. Roger> po/POTFILES.in), or will the format used for the conditionals in .in Roger> files change at a future date? What I need to do is have lines Roger> conditi

AM_CONDITIONAL and config.status

2002-02-02 Thread Roger Leigh
I make heavy use of AM_CONDITIONAL in my Makefile.ams, mainly for conditional compiliation of stuff. This now works really well with automake 1.5 (it required nasty hacks with 1.4). My question is, although I use if CONDITIONAL FOO else BAR endif in Makefile.am, and this becomes @CONDITIONAL_