On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 03:18 +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Only the
sender can do anything better than this, because they're the only one
with the necessary information.
Its not at all clear to me that they have sufficient information.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 07:01 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:15:31PM CET:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter. We are all losers with this: you waste your time
writing an answer
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter.
I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter on auto*.gnu.org lists, because
they tend to be
Ralf == Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter.
Ralf I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter.
I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter on auto*.gnu.org
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way
that
- some gnu.org lists but not all automatically exclude subscribers if
they are listed in To: or Cc:.
This is customizable, see the mailman options page.
Andreas.
--
Andreas
In this case I looked at the list of people in the discussion, knew
they were all subscribed, and intentionally mailed only to the list. ;-)
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way
that
- some gnu.org
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 07:01 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:39:16AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 07:01 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do
Ralf == Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 21:12 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
Meussen == Meussen Erik IT415 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Meussen checking whether autoconf is recent enough . . . no
Meussen configure: error: Autoconf 2.58 or better
Hello all,
maybe anyone can help me with this. I downloaded automake 1.9. Configure
displays a message saying:
checking whether autoconf is recent enough . . . no
configure: error: Autoconf 2.58 or better is required.
Using:
# which autoconf
/usr/local/bin/autoconf
# autoconf -V
Meussen == Meussen Erik IT415 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Meussen Hello all,
Meussen maybe anyone can help me with this. I downloaded
Meussen automake 1.9. Configure displays a message saying:
Meussen checking whether autoconf is recent enough . . . no
Meussen configure: error: Autoconf
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 21:12 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
Meussen == Meussen Erik IT415 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Meussen Hello all,
Meussen maybe anyone can help me with this. I downloaded
Meussen automake 1.9. Configure displays a message saying:
Meussen checking whether
14 matches
Mail list logo
