AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
Hi edward,
I have been snowed this week, but I plan to integrate the libtool part of
your patch in the next couple of days. I'm Cc:ing the automake list in
the
hope that the
*all of
my changes* with respect to cvs libtool and automake.
- Original Message -
From: "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
On Sunday 11 Ma
PROTECTED]
To: "edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
Hi edward,
I have been snowed this week, but I plan to integrate the libtool part of
your patch in the next couple
"edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
prior to this patch, automake would not generate rules for
foo_SOURCES - foo_OBJECTS etc. now it does, and the conditionals determine
which get executed
I have plenty of patches in the queue that address things related to
this issue :(
1) autodep
ChangeLog:
2001-03-12 Edward M. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* progs.am: install patch for Cygwin. The cygwin /usr/bin/install
program has the following behavior for install -c SRC DST:
Scenario 1: "src.exe" exists and "src" does not:
1) if SRC=src.exe and
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
"edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| --- orig/automake.in.orig Mon Mar 12 06:44:59 2001
| +++ automake.in Mon Mar 12 07:44:57 2001
| @@ -1048,8 +1048,17 @@
| # If OBJEXT/EXEEXT were not set in configure.in, do it, it
| # simplifies our task, and anyway starting with Autoconf 2.50, it
| # will always be defined, and
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
snip
Huh? It is still wrong. This has no reason to depe
"tailbert" == tailbert edward writes:
Rather the proper fix seems to have the failing tests include
AC_EXEEXT and AC_OBJEXT in their configure.in.
tailbert Akim, I mean in the general case, even outside of the test
tailbert cases. On windows platforms, executables get a .exe
tailbert
- Original Message -
From: "edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Akim Demaille" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille"
On Mar 12, 2001, "Robert Collins" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well as CVS libtool (the point of the exercise :]) depends on CVS
automake CVS autoconf
Does it? It shouldn't. Are you sure?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer
On Mar 13, 2001, "Robert Collins" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"The CVS version of GNU libtool often depends on some yet to be released
^
versions of GNU Autoconf and GNU Automake."
Just before the "Resources" section.
AFAIK, the current CVS version of
for things cygwin.
(And those two tests fail on cygwin as well)..
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:12 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: edward; Akim Demaille; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 5:14 AM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
Hi edward,
I'm not sure whether you want blow by blow bug re
al Message -
From: "edward" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
SNIP and had the following tests fail:
XFAIL: cond3.test
cond3.test fails for three reasons.
SNIP
FAIL: p
the fix for pr19.test i posted is not intended to *fix* the test. rather, it
is meant for it to fail for the *same* reasons on any other platform that
uses gnu make, as opposed to failing because of a cygwin thing.
gnu make will remove intermediate targets, so make dist fails because foo.c
is an
16 matches
Mail list logo
