Re: The %.o: %.cc rule

2001-07-01 Thread Tom Tromey
Clark == Clark Rawlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I never saw an answer to this. Clark I got automake and autoconf out of cvs and did Clark [ ... ] Clark on both projects autoconf first then automake Clark and now I get some errors when I run aclocal and automake. Clark %aclocal Clark aclocal:

Re: The %.o: %.cc rule

2001-06-05 Thread Clark Rawlins
Tom, Thanks for the guidance so far. I got automake and autoconf out of cvs and did ./configure --prefix=$HOME make test install on both projects autoconf first then automake and now I get some errors when I run aclocal and automake. %aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 10: macro

Re: The %.o: %.cc rule

2001-06-05 Thread Raja R Harinath
Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hair == Raja R Harinath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Clark test_SOURCES = d1/s1.cc d2/s2.cc Hair Try using Hair AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = subdir-objects subdir-objects will cause Makefile to build d1/s1.o and d2/s2.o. Without it, the above test_SOURCES will

Re: The %.o: %.cc rule

2001-06-04 Thread Tom Tromey
Clark == Clark Rawlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Clark Is there any kind of concensus on what would be the 'correct' Clark way to do this in automake? Is there a consensus that automake Clark should continue to support these old compilers? Yes, automake should support these old compilers.

Re: The %.o: %.cc rule

2001-06-04 Thread Tom Tromey
Hair == Raja R Harinath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Clark test_SOURCES = d1/s1.cc d2/s2.cc Hair Try using Hair AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = subdir-objects subdir-objects will cause Makefile to build d1/s1.o and d2/s2.o. Without it, the above test_SOURCES will still work but the .o files will end up in