de 127
make: './aclocal.m4' removed.
As you can see, it seems to want automake 1.15 or higher, and I only have 1.10.
Why is make this way round still requiring aclocal 1.15?
Thanks again,
Andy
From: Eric Blake
Sent: 30 May 2018 20:51
To: Andy Armstrong; automake@gnu
On 05/30/2018 02:23 PM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi Eric,
[top-posting is a bit harder to read on a technical list, so I'll stick
with the easier-to-read inline posting]
That could well be a far better approach. I am not sure how to perform cross
platform builds, especially taking into
From: Eric Blake
Sent: 30 May 2018 18:01
To: Andy Armstrong; automake@gnu.org
Subject: Re: automake compile problems
On 05/30/2018 11:12 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> To give some context to what I am doing, here is the timeline:
>
>
> I did have Automake version 1.10, but my u
On 05/30/2018 11:12 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
To give some context to what I am doing, here is the timeline:
I did have Automake version 1.10, but my ultimate goal here is to compile the
nano text editor, which requires at least automake 1.15 and autoconf 2.69.
That's if you are modifying
Makefile
.SOURCE : .NULL
@B = $(@:b)
@D = $(@:d)
@F = $(@:f)
%B = $(%:b)
%D = $(%:d)
%F = $(%:f)
*B = $(*:b)
*D = $(*:d)
*F = $(*:f)
Sent: 30 May 2018 15:13
To: Andy Armstrong; automake@gnu.org
Subject: Re: automake compile problems
On 05/30/2018 04:07 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
On Wed, 30 May 2018, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/30/2018 04:07 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi all,
I want to compile version 1.16 of automake.
On which system?
Must be IBM, and perhaps z/OS:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.bpxa800/fsum9432.htm
Bob
--
On 05/30/2018 04:07 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi all,
I want to compile version 1.16 of automake.
On which system?
I run ./configure, which creates the Makefile. I run 'make' which results in
the following:
automake-1.16: >make
make: Makefile: line 3012: Warning -- FSUM9432 Duplicate
