Re: Workarounds for automake does not support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally

2007-11-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:52:30AM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Brooks Moses wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:19:21PM CET: This resulted in the error quoted in the subject line, automake does not support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally, followed by an

Re: Workarounds for automake does not support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally

2007-11-08 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Brooks, * Brooks Moses wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:19:21PM CET: This resulted in the error quoted in the subject line, automake does not support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally, followed by an Internal Error. Hmm, something got stuck there:

Re: Workarounds for automake does not support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally

2007-11-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Brooks, * Brooks Moses wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:19:21PM CET: This resulted in the error quoted in the subject line, automake does not support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally, followed by an Internal Error. Hmm, something got stuck there:

Workarounds for automake does not support info_TEXINFOS being defined conditionally

2007-11-07 Thread Brooks Moses
Hello! I'm working on a bit of the binutils source tree with an automake setup, and I'd like to add a configure-time option to enable or disable the building of a particular bit of documentation. I first tried out the naive way, of using AM_CONDITIONAL and this bit in Makefile.am: